A three-arm randomised Phase II study of the MEK inhibitor selumetinib alone or in combination with paclitaxel in metastatic uveal melanoma

Joseph J Sacco,Richard Jackson,Pippa Corrie,Sarah Danson,T.R. Jeffry Evans,Sebastian Ochsenreither,Satish Kumar,Andrew Goodman,James Larkin,Ioannis Karydis,Neil Steven,Paul Lorigan,Ruth Plummer,Poulam Patel,Eftychia Psarelli,Anna Olsson-Brown,Heather Shaw,Serge Leyvraz,Louise Handley,Charlotte Rawcliffe,Paul Nathan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114009
IF: 10.002
2024-03-13
European Journal of Cancer
Abstract:Aims The MAPK pathway is constitutively activated in uveal melanoma (UM). Selumetinib (AZD6244, ARRY-142886), a MEK inhibitor, has shown limited activity as monotherapy in metastatic UM. Pre-clinical studies support synergistic cytotoxic activity for MEK inhibitors combined with taxanes, and here we sought to assess the clinical efficacy of combining selumetinib and paclitaxel. Patients and Methods Seventy-seven patients with metastatic UM who had not received prior chemotherapy were randomised to selumetinib alone, or combined with paclitaxel with or without interruption in selumetinib two days before paclitaxel. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). After amendment, the combination arms were combined for analysis and the sample size adjusted to detect a hazard ratio (HR): 0.55, 80% power at 1-sided 5% significance level. Results The median PFS in the combination arms was 4.8 months (95% CI: 3.8 - 5.6) compared with 3.4 months (2.0 - 3.9) in the selumetinib arm (HR 0.62 [90% CI 0.41 - 0.92], 1-sided p-value = 0.022). ORR was 14% and 4% in the combination and monotherapy arms respectively. Median OS was 9 months for the combination and was not significantly different from selumetinib alone (10 months) with HR of 0.98 [90% CI 0.58 - 1.66], 1-sided p-value = 0.469. Toxicity was in keeping with the known profiles of the agents involved. Conclusions SelPac met its primary endpoint, demonstrating an improvement in PFS for combination selumetinib and paclitaxel. No improvement in OS was observed, and the modest improvement in PFS is not practice changing.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?