Abstract:Governance is a multifaceted and complex process, involving a wide range of stakeholders from numerous institutions and individuals with different interests, agendas and sets of skills. A number of barriers exist for states to work together on securing their shared coastal and marine ecosystems, with discussions often becoming clouded when disputes arise over Exclusive Economic Zones, borders, oil and gas resources, continental shelves, maritime transport, and fisheries. Over the last twenty-six years, the Global Environment Facility’s (GEF) International Waters focal area has utilized the Large Marine Ecosystem (LME) approach to navigate the complex problems related to transboundary issues affecting the world’s marine ecosystems, of which forty-one out of sixty-six are shared (62%) by one or more countries. To overcome the disputes and assumptions about the intentions of neighboring states, the GEF developed the Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis-Strategic Action Programme (TDA-SAP) assessment and strategic planning processes to help countries learn how to work together and build trust. This formal and inclusive process analyses all pertinent factual and scientific information to set priorities for action. This practical method for integrating science into management has provided an effective approach to inform and advance sustainable LME management and governance regimes; however, there is not a one size fits all approach. This review presents six examples from the GEF International Waters portfolio that demonstrate how the LME Approach and TDA-SAP process have helped countries find the best way to mainstream ecosystem-based management approaches into existing contexts and politics. While these examples span a wide range of different settings (geographic, political, socio-economic, temporal), they have all applied the LME Approach and TDA-SAP process to tackle complex regional ocean governance issues. Each example provides a historical perspective, the key results achieved, and their unique lessons learned/best practices. Furthermore, the review identifies some of the overall shortcomings of the process and the common lessons learned, underscoring the complex and daunting challenge of achieving effective governance for multi-country LMEs. The experience provided by these examples shows that practical ecosystem-based management of the ocean and its coasts not only requires flexibility and adaptability, but also time, associated long-term vision and commitment.

Multistakeholder regional dialogues as catalysers for transboundary water cooperation

More Sustainable Participation? Multi-Stakeholder Platforms for Integrated Catchment Management

Advancing Ocean Governance in Marine Regions Through Stakeholder Dialogue Processes

Engaging stakeholders to address a complex water resource management issue in the Western Cape, South Africa

Modelling to bridge many boundaries: the Colorado and Murray-Darling River basins

Global Water Challenges in Sub-Saharan Africa and how to strengthen science-policy dialogues on transboundary governance and cooperation

Multistakeholder Partnerships for Sustainable Development: Promises and Pitfalls

Does data lead to cooperation? Lessons from Water Accounting Plus in the Cauvery basin, India

Empowering small stakeholders groups in selecting a long-term water management plan

Multi-stakeholder analysis to improve agricultural water management policy and practice in Malta

Navigating the Complexity of Regional Ocean Governance Through the Large Marine Ecosystems Approach

To Be, to Do, to Share: The Triple-Loop of Water Governance to Improve Urban Water Resilience—Testing the Benidorm’ Experience, Spain

Up close and personal: an essential ingredient in transboundary water basin agreements

Multi-stakeholder participation for sustainable delta management: a challenge of the socio-technical transformation in the management practices in Bangladesh

Exploring the use of data and models in transboundary water governance

Maximizing synergies between state and non‐state actors to enhance water governance in the Cubango‐Okavango River basin

Analyzing multi-stakeholder collaborative governance practices in urban water projects in Addis Ababa City: procedures, priorities, and structures

Developing stakeholder participation to address lack of safe water as a community health concern in a rural province in South Africa

Beyond engagement: Enhancing equity in collaborative water governance

Soft-cooperation Via Data Sharing Eases Transboundary Conflicts in the Lancang-Mekong River Basin

Stakeholder involvement for management of the coastal zone