Abstract:Deep neural network (DNN) accelerators overcome the power and memory walls for executing neural-net models locally on edge-computing devices to support sophisticated AI applications. The advocacy of “model once, run optimized anywhere” paradigm introduces potential new security threat to edge intelligence that is methodologically different from the well-known adversarial examples. Existing adversarial examples modify the input samples presented to an AI application either digitally or physically to cause a misclassification. Nevertheless, these input-based perturbations are not robust or surreptitious on multi-view target. To generate a good adversarial example for misclassifying a real-world target of variational viewing angle, lighting and distance, a decent number of target’s samples are required to extract the rare anomalies that can cross the decision boundary. The feasible perturbations are substantial and visually perceptible. In this paper, we propose a new glitch injection attack on DNN accelerator that is capable of misclassifying a target under variational viewpoints. The glitches injected into the computation clock signal induce transitory but disruptive errors in the intermediate results of the multiply-and-accumulate (MAC) operations. The attack pattern for each target of interest consists of sparse instantaneous glitches, which can be derived from just one sample of the target. Two modes of attack patterns are derived, and their effectiveness are demonstrated on four representative ImageNet models implemented on the Deep-learning Processing Unit (DPU) of FPGA edge and its DNN development toolchain. The attack success rates are evaluated on 118 objects in 61 diverse sensing conditions, including 25 viewing angles (−60° to 60°), 24 illumination directions and 12 color temperatures. In the covert mode, the success rates of our attack exceed existing stealthy adversarial examples by more than 16.3%, with only two glitches injected into ten thousands to a million cycles for one complete inference. In the robust mode, the attack success rates on all four DNNs are more than 96.2% with an average glitch intensity of 1.4% and a maximum glitch intensity of 10.2%.

Analysis of Power-Oriented Fault Injection Attacks on Spiking Neural Networks

NeuroAttack: Undermining Spiking Neural Networks Security through Externally Triggered Bit-Flips

Sneaky Spikes: Uncovering Stealthy Backdoor Attacks in Spiking Neural Networks with Neuromorphic Data

Exploring Adversarial Attack in Spiking Neural Networks with Spike-Compatible Gradient.

SpikingJET: Enhancing Fault Injection for Fully and Convolutional Spiking Neural Networks

Toward Robust Spiking Neural Network Against Adversarial Perturbation

A Comprehensive Analysis on Adversarial Robustness of Spiking Neural Networks

Artificial VO2 Spiking Neurons with Protective Mechanism for Enhancing Resilience of Spiking Neural Network Against Adversarial Attacks

Time-Distributed Backdoor Attacks on Federated Spiking Learning

A Deep Investigation on Stealthy DVFS Fault Injection Attacks at DNN Hardware Accelerators

Stealthy and Robust Glitch Injection Attack on Deep Learning Accelerator for Target with Variational Viewpoint.

Spiking Neural Networks Subject to Adversarial Attacks in Spiking Domain.

SNN-RAT: Robustness-enhanced Spiking Neural Network through Regularized Adversarial Training

BrInstFlip: A Universal Tool for Attacking DNN-Based Power Line Fault Detection Models

SPA: an Efficient Adversarial Attack on Spiking Neural Networks Using Spike Probabilistic

Practical Fault Attack on Deep Neural Networks

Rate Gradient Approximation Attack Threats Deep Spiking Neural Networks

Threaten Spiking Neural Networks Through Combining Rate and Temporal Information

Robust Stable Spiking Neural Networks

Adversarial Attacks on Neural-Network-Based Soft Sensors: Directly Attack Output

Attacking the Spike: On the Transferability and Security of Spiking Neural Networks to Adversarial Examples