Abstract:A pivotal response treatment package consisting of clinician-delivered and parent-implemented strategies was recently found to be effective in improving language and social communication deficits in children with autism spectrum disorder. Reciprocal vocal contingency, an automated measure of vocal reciprocity, may provide stronger and complementary evidence of the effects of the pivotal response treatment package. Reciprocal vocal contingency is derived through an automated process from daylong audio samples from the child’s natural environment. Therefore, reciprocal vocal contingency is at lower risk for detection bias than parent report and brief parent–child interaction measures. Although differences were non-significant at baseline and after 12 weeks of intervention for the 48 children with autism spectrum disorder who were randomly assigned to the pivotal response treatment package or a delayed treatment control group, the pivotal response treatment package group had higher ranked reciprocal vocal contingency scores than the control group after 24 weeks ( U = 125, p = .04). These findings are consistent with results from parent report and parent–child interaction measures obtained during the trial. The participants in the pivotal response treatment package exhibited greater vocal responsiveness to adult vocal responses to their vocalizations than the control group. Findings support the effectiveness of the pivotal response treatment package on vocal reciprocity of children with autism spectrum disorder, which may be a pivotal skill for language development. Lay abstract A recent randomized controlled trial found that children with autism spectrum disorder who received a pivotal response treatment package showed improved language and social communication skills following the intervention. The pivotal response treatment package includes clinician-delivered and parent-implemented strategies. Reciprocal vocal contingency is an automated measure of vocal reciprocity derived from daylong audio samples from the child’s natural environment. It may provide stronger and complementary evidence of the effects of the pivotal response treatment package because it is at lower risk for detection bias than parent report and brief parent–child interaction measures. The current study compared reciprocal vocal contingency for 24 children with autism spectrum disorder in the pivotal response treatment package group and 24 children with autism spectrum disorder in the control group. The pivotal response treatment package group received 24 weeks of the pivotal response treatment package intervention. The control group received their usual intervention services during that time. The groups did not differ in reciprocal vocal contingency when the intervention started or after 12 weeks of intervention. However, after 24 weeks the pivotal response treatment package group had higher ranked reciprocal vocal contingency scores than the control group. These findings are consistent with results from parent report and parent–child interaction measures obtained during the trial. The participants in the pivotal response treatment package exhibited greater vocal responsiveness to adult vocal responses to their vocalizations than the control group. Findings support the effectiveness of the pivotal response treatment package on vocal reciprocity of children with autism spectrum disorder, which may be a pivotal skill for language development.

Evaluating functions of praise for children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder

Evaluation of a discrimination training procedure for establishing praise as a reinforcer

Effectiveness of Prompts and Performance Feedback on Teacher's Use of Behavior Specific Praise and Behavioral Outcomes for Students on the Autism Spectrum

Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Stimulus Pairing Observation Procedure and Multiple Exemplar Instruction on Tact and Listener Responses in Children with Autism

Parent Education for Young Children With Autism and Disruptive Behavior: Response to Active Control Treatment

Student-delivered behavior-specific praise: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Examining the reinforcing value of stimuli within social and non-social contexts in children with and without high-functioning autism

Effects of two variations of differential reinforcement on prompt dependency

Effects of a Contingent Responses Intervention on the Quantity and Quality of Vocalizations of Preschool Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Using Instructions and Acoustic Feedback to Improve Staff Delivery of Behavior-Specific Praise in a Clinical Setting

Examining Procedural Variations of Delivering Competing Stimuli in the Treatment of Stereotypy

Generalization and Discrimination of Positively Reinforced Explicit Mands in Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Social ‘wanting’ dysfunction in autism: neurobiological underpinnings and treatment implications

Evaluating preference displacement of edible stimuli and social interactions for typically developing preschool children

Effects of pivotal response treatment on reciprocal vocal contingency in a randomized controlled trial of children with autism spectrum disorder

Comparisons of discrete-trial and normalized behavioral language intervention for young children with autism

Assessing negative reinforcement through simultaneous observing and committed concurrent progressive‐ratio procedures: Preliminary investigations

Teaching Two Autistic Children to Request Continuation of Social Routines with Their Parents Using an iPad®-Based Speech-Generating Device

Preference for Prompting Procedures to Address Escape-Maintained Behavior in Autistic Adolescents

Examining patterns suggestive of acquisition during functional analyses: A consecutive controlled series of 116 cases

Implementing Pivotal Response Treatment to Teach Question Asking to High School Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder