Sternal fixation for traumatic sternal fractures demonstrates better long‐term quality of life outcomes than nonoperative management: A survey analysis

Zachary M. Bauman,Sydney J. Todd,Hason Khan,Ashley Raposo‐Hadley,Emily Cantrell,Miguel Matos,Olabisi Sheppard,Andrew Kamien,Trevor Daubert,Samuel Cemaj,Charity H. Evans,Jonathan Nguyen,Bennett Berning
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12164
IF: 3.282
2024-03-31
World Journal of Surgery
Abstract:Introduction Sternal fractures are rare, causing significant pain, respiratory compromise, and decreased upper extremity range of motion. Sternal fixation (SF) is a viable treatment option; however, there remains a paucity of literature demonstrating long‐term benefits. This study examined long‐term outcomes of SF, hypothesizing they have better long‐term quality of life (QoL) than patients managed nonoperatively (NOM). Methods This was a survey study at our level 1 academic hospital. All patients diagnosed with a sternal fracture were included from January 2016 to July 2021. Patients were grouped whether they received SF or NOM. Basic demographics were obtained. Three survey phone call attempts were conducted. The time from injury to survey was recorded. Outcomes included responses to the QoL survey, which included mobility, self‐care, usual activities, chest pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The survey scale is 1–5 (1 = worst condition possible; 5 = best possible condition). Patients were asked to rate their current health on a scale of 0–100 (100 being the best possible health imaginable). Chi square and t‐tests were used. Significance was set at p
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?