EEG decoders track memory dynamics

Yuxuan Li,Jesse K. Pazdera,Michael J. Kahana
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46926-0
IF: 16.6
2024-04-06
Nature Communications
Abstract:Abstract Encoding- and retrieval-related neural activity jointly determine mnemonic success. We ask whether electroencephalographic activity can reliably predict encoding and retrieval success on individual trials. Each of 98 participants performed a delayed recall task on 576 lists across 24 experimental sessions. Logistic regression classifiers trained on spectral features measured immediately preceding spoken recall of individual words successfully predict whether or not those words belonged to the target list. Classifiers trained on features measured during word encoding also reliably predict whether those words will be subsequently recalled and further predict the temporal and semantic organization of the recalled items. These findings link neural variability predictive of successful memory with item-to-context binding, a key cognitive process thought to underlie episodic memory function.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to predict the success rates of memory encoding and recall by analyzing scalp electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. Specifically, the researchers want to verify the following points: 1. **Predicting successful memory encoding**: The researchers hope to determine whether spectral features in EEG signals can be used to reliably predict whether an individual has successfully remembered a certain word during the memory encoding stage. This involves training logistic regression classifiers that predict whether a word will be subsequently recalled based on the EEG spectral features before encoding. 2. **Predicting successful recall**: The researchers also hope to determine whether correct and incorrect recalls (such as intrusion errors) can be distinguished by spectral features in EEG signals before the recall stage. This also involves training classifiers, but this time on the EEG signals before the recall stage. 3. **Differentiating neural signals of successful memory**: The researchers hope to isolate neural signals related to successful memory, rather than signals related to list position or recall time, by resampling events (i.e., ensuring the same proportion of positive and negative examples for each list position or recall output position). This can lead to a more accurate understanding of which neural activities truly reflect successful memory. 4. **Exploring individual differences**: The researchers also want to explore whether there are differences in memory dynamics among different individuals and attempt to model these differences through multivariate analysis methods. By solving these problems, the researchers hope to better understand the neural mechanisms in the memory encoding and recall processes and how these mechanisms affect memory performance. These findings contribute to the theoretical development in the field of cognitive neuroscience and may provide new ideas for the diagnosis and treatment of memory disorders.