Subsynaptic positioning of AMPARs by LRRTM2 controls synaptic strength

Austin M. Ramsey,Ai-Hui Tang,Tara A. LeGates,Xu-Zhuo Gou,Beatrice E. Carbone,Scott M. Thompson,Thomas Biederer,Thomas A. Blanpied

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf3126

IF: 13.6

2021-08-20

Science Advances

Abstract:The nanoscale distribution of AMPA receptors is under rapid control by adhesion proteins and helps regulate their activation.

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Molecular Mechanisms of AMPA Receptor Trafficking in the Nervous System

Yi-Yang Cao,Ling-Ling Wu,Xiao-Nan Li,Yu-Lian Yuan,Wan-Wei Zhao,Jing-Xuan Qi,Xu-Yu Zhao,Natalie Ward,Jiao Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25010111

IF: 5.6

2023-12-21

International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Abstract:Synaptic plasticity enhances or reduces connections between neurons, affecting learning and memory. Postsynaptic AMPARs mediate greater than 90% of the rapid excitatory synaptic transmission in glutamatergic neurons. The number and subunit composition of AMPARs are fundamental to synaptic plasticity and the formation of entire neural networks. Accordingly, the insertion and functionalization of AMPARs at the postsynaptic membrane have become a core issue related to neural circuit formation and information processing in the central nervous system. In this review, we summarize current knowledge regarding the related mechanisms of AMPAR expression and trafficking. The proteins related to AMPAR trafficking are discussed in detail, including vesicle-related proteins, cytoskeletal proteins, synaptic proteins, and protein kinases. Furthermore, significant emphasis was placed on the pivotal role of the actin cytoskeleton, which spans throughout the entire transport process in AMPAR transport, indicating that the actin cytoskeleton may serve as a fundamental basis for AMPAR trafficking. Additionally, we summarize the proteases involved in AMPAR post-translational modifications. Moreover, we provide an overview of AMPAR transport and localization to the postsynaptic membrane. Understanding the assembly, trafficking, and dynamic synaptic expression mechanisms of AMPAR may provide valuable insights into the cognitive decline associated with neurodegenerative diseases.

biochemistry & molecular biology,chemistry, multidisciplinary
Subunit-specific rules governing AMPA receptor trafficking to synapses in hippocampal pyramidal neurons.

S Shi,Y Hayashi,J A Esteban,R Malinow

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00321-X

IF: 64.5

2001-01-01

Cell

Abstract:AMPA-type glutamate receptors (AMPA-Rs) mediate a majority of excitatory synaptic transmission in the brain. In hippocampus, most AMPA-Rs are hetero-oligomers composed of GluR1/GluR2 or GluR2/GluR3 subunits. Here we show that these AMPA-R forms display different synaptic delivery mechanisms. GluR1/GluR2 receptors are added to synapses during plasticity; this requires interactions between GluR1 and group I PDZ domain proteins. In contrast, GluR2/GluR3 receptors replace existing synaptic receptors continuously; this occurs only at synapses that already have AMPA-Rs and requires interactions by GluR2 with NSF and group II PDZ domain proteins. The combination of regulated addition and continuous replacement of synaptic receptors can stabilize long-term changes in synaptic efficacy and may serve as a general model for how surface receptor number is established and maintained.
Neuroligin-3 confines AMPA receptors into nanoclusters, thereby controlling synaptic strength at the calyx of Held synapses

Ying Han,Ran Cao,Liming Qin,Lulu Y Chen,Ai-Hui Tang,Thomas C Südhof,Bo Zhang,Lulu Y. Chen,Thomas C. Südhof

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abo4173

IF: 13.6

2022-06-16

Science Advances

Abstract:The subsynaptic organization of postsynaptic neurotransmitter receptors into nanoclusters that are aligned with presynaptic release sites is essential for the high fidelity of synaptic transmission. However, the mechanisms controlling the nanoscale organization of neurotransmitter receptors in vivo remain incompletely understood. Here, we deconstructed the role of neuroligin-3 (Nlgn3), a postsynaptic adhesion molecule linked to autism, in organizing AMPA-type glutamate receptors in the calyx of Held synapse. Deletion of Nlgn3 lowered the amplitude and slowed the kinetics of AMPA receptor–mediated synaptic responses. Super-resolution microscopy revealed that, unexpectedly, these impairments in synaptic transmission were associated with an increase in the size of postsynaptic PSD-95 and AMPA receptor nanoclusters but a decrease of the densities in these clusters. Modeling showed that a dilution of AMPA receptors into larger nanocluster volumes decreases synaptic strength. Nlgn3, likely by binding to presynaptic neurexins, thus is a key organizer of AMPA receptor nanoclusters that likely acts via PSD-95 adaptors to optimize the fidelity of synaptic transmission.

multidisciplinary sciences
The AMPA Receptor Code of Synaptic Plasticity

Graham H. Diering,Richard L. Huganir

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.10.018

IF: 16.2

2018-10-01

Neuron

Abstract:Changes in the properties and postsynaptic abundance of AMPA-type glutamate receptors (AMPARs) are major mechanisms underlying various forms of synaptic plasticity, including long-term potentiation (LTP), long-term depression (LTD), and homeostatic scaling. The function and the trafficking of AMPARs to and from synapses is modulated by specific AMPAR GluA1-GluA4 subunits, subunit-specific protein interactors, auxiliary subunits, and posttranslational modifications. Layers of regulation are added to AMPAR tetramers through these different interactions and modifications, increasing the computational power of synapses. Here we review the reliance of synaptic plasticity on AMPAR variants and propose "the AMPAR code" as a conceptual framework. The AMPAR code suggests that AMPAR variants will be predictive of the types and extent of synaptic plasticity that can occur and that a hierarchy exists such that certain AMPARs will be disproportionally recruited to synapses during LTP/homeostatic scaling up, or removed during LTD/homeostatic scaling down.

neurosciences
Molecular Mechanism of AMPA Receptor Modulation by TARP/Stargazin

Anat Ben-Yaacov,Moshe Gillor,Tomer Haham,Alon Parsai,Mohammad Qneibi,Yael Stern-Bach

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.01.032

IF: 16.2

2017-03-08

Neuron

Abstract:AMPA receptors (AMPARs) mediate the majority of fast excitatory transmission in the brain and critically contribute to synaptic plasticity and pathology. AMPAR trafficking and gating are tightly controlled by auxiliary transmembrane AMPAR regulatory proteins (TARPs). Here, using systematic domain swaps with the TARP-insensitive kainate receptor GluK2, we show that AMPAR interaction with the prototypical TARP stargazin/γ2 primarily involves the AMPAR membrane domains M1 and M4 of neighboring subunits, initiated or stabilized by the AMPAR C-tail, and that these interactions are sufficient to enable full receptor modulation. Moreover, employing TARP chimeras disclosed a key role in this process also for the TARP transmembrane domains TM3 and TM4 and extracellular loop 2. Mechanistically, our data support a two-step action in which binding of TARP to the AMPAR membrane domains destabilizes the channel closed state, thereby enabling an efficient opening upon agonist binding, which then stabilizes the open state via subsequent interactions.
Synapse specific and plasticity-regulated AMPAR mobility tunes synaptic integration

Agata Nowacka,Angela M. Getz,Hanna L. Zieger,Diogo Bessa-Neto,Christelle Breillat,Sophie Daburon,Cécile Lemoigne,Sébastien Marais,Mathieu Ducros,Andrew C. Penn,Matthieu Sainlos,Daniel Choquet

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.19.584837

2024-03-20

Abstract:Synaptic responses adapt to fast repetitive inputs during bursts of neuronal network activity over timescales of milliseconds to seconds, either transiently facilitating or depressing. This high-frequency stimulus-dependent short-term synaptic plasticity (HF-STP) relies on a number of molecular processes that collectively endow synapses with filtering properties for information processing, optimized for the transmission of certain input frequencies and patterns in distinct circuits . Changes in HF-STP are traditionally thought to stem from changes in pre-synaptic transmitter release , but post-synaptic modifications in receptor biophysical properties or surface diffusion also regulate HF-STP . A major challenge in understanding synapse function is to decipher how pre- and post-synaptic mechanisms synergistically tune synaptic transmission efficacy during HF-STP, and to determine how neuronal activity modifies post-synaptic signal computation and integration to diversify neuronal circuit function. Here, taking advantage of new molecular tools to directly visualize glutamate release and specifically manipulate the surface diffusion of endogenous AMPAR in intact circuits , we define the respective contributions of pre-synaptic glutamate release, AMPAR desensitization and surface mobility to frequency-dependent synaptic adaptation. We demonstrate that post-synaptic gain control and signal integration capacity in synaptic networks is influenced by synapse-specific differences in AMPAR desensitization and diffusion-trapping characteristics that are shaped by molecular signaling events recruited during LTP.

Neuroscience
AMPA Receptor Surface Expression Is Regulated by S-Nitrosylation of Thorase and Transnitrosylation of NSF

George K E Umanah,Mehdi Ghasemi,Xiling Yin,Melissa Chang,Jin Wan Kim,Jianmin Zhang,Erica Ma,Leslie A Scarffe,Yun-Il Lee,Rong Chen,Kavya Tangella,Amy McNamara,Leire Abalde-Atristain,Mohamad A Dar,Samuel Bennett,Marisol Cortes,Shaida A Andrabi,Paschalis-Thomas Doulias,Harry Ischiropoulos,Ted M Dawson,Valina L Dawson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108329

2020-11-03

Abstract:The regulation of α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor (AMPAR) trafficking affects multiple brain functions, such as learning and memory. We have previously shown that Thorase plays an important role in the internalization of AMPARs from the synaptic membrane. Here, we show that N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) activation leads to increased S-nitrosylation of Thorase and N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor (NSF). S-nitrosylation of Thorase stabilizes Thorase-AMPAR complexes and enhances the internalization of AMPAR and interaction with protein-interacting C kinase 1 (PICK1). S-nitrosylated NSF is dependent on the S-nitrosylation of Thorase via trans-nitrosylation, which modulates the surface insertion of AMPARs. In the presence of the S-nitrosylation-deficient C137L Thorase mutant, AMPAR trafficking, long-term potentiation, and long-term depression are impaired. Overall, our data suggest that both S-nitrosylation and interactions of Thorase and NSF/PICK1 are required to modulate AMPAR-mediated synaptic plasticity. This study provides critical information that elucidates the mechanism underlying Thorase and NSF-mediated trafficking of AMPAR complexes.
The Synaptic Localization of NR2B-Containing NMDA Receptors is Controlled by Interactions with PDZ Proteins and AP-2

K Prybylowski,K Chang,N Sans,LL Kan,S Vicini,RJ Wenthold

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.08.016

IF: 16.2

2005-01-01

Neuron

Abstract:The NMDA receptor (NMDAR) is a component of excitatory synapses and a key participant in synaptic plasticity. We investigated the role of two domains in the C terminus of the NR2B subunit—the PDZ binding domain and the clathrin adaptor protein (AP-2) binding motif—in the synaptic localization of NMDA receptors. NR2B subunits lacking functional PDZ binding are excluded from the synapse. Mutations in the AP-2 binding motif, YEKL, significantly increase the number of synaptic receptors and allow the synaptic localization of NR2B subunits lacking PDZ binding. Peptides corresponding to YEKL increase the synaptic response within minutes. In contrast, the NR2A subunit localizes to the synapse in the absence of PDZ binding and is not altered by mutations in its motif corresponding to YEKL of NR2B. This study identifies a dynamic regulation of synaptic NR2B-containing NMDARs through PDZ protein-mediated stabilization and AP-2-mediated internalization that is modulated by phosphorylation by Fyn kinase.
Subsynaptic Spatial Organization As a Regulator of Synaptic Strength and Plasticity

Haiwen Chen,Ai-Hui Tang,Thomas A. Blanpied

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2018.05.004

IF: 7.07

2018-01-01

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract:Synapses differ markedly in their performance, even amongst those on a single neuron. The mechanisms that drive this functional diversification are of great interest because they enable adaptive behaviors and are targets of pathology. Considerable effort has focused on elucidating mechanisms of plasticity that involve changes to presynaptic release probability and the number of postsynaptic receptors. However, recent work is clarifying that nanoscale organization of the proteins within glutamatergic synapses impacts synapse function. Specifically, active zone scaffold proteins form nanoclusters that define sites of neurotransmitter release, and these sites align transsynaptically with clustered postsynaptic receptors. These nanostructural characteristics raise numerous possibilities for how synaptic plasticity could be expressed.
Distinct Trafficking and Expression Mechanisms Underlie Ltp and Ltd of Nmda Receptor-Mediated Synaptic Responses

Yi Peng,Jiang Zhao,Qin-Hua Gu,Rong-Qing Chen,Zhuo Xu,Jin-Zhi Yan,Shan-Hui Wang,Su-Yi Liu,Zheng Chen,Wei Lu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.20654

2009-01-01

Hippocampus

Abstract:Although an increasing number of studies have demonstrated the plasticity of NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic transmission, little is known about the molecular mechanisms that underlie this neurologically important process. In a study of NMDAR-mediated synaptic responses in hippocampal Schaffer-CA1 synapses whose AMPA receptor (AMPAR) activity is totally blocked, we uncovered differences between the trafficking mechanisms that underlie the long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) that can be induced in these cells under these conditions. The LTP-producing protocol failed to induce a change in the amplitude of NMDAR-mediated postsynaptic currents (NMDAR EPSCs) in the first 5-10 min, but induced gradual enhancement of NMDAR EPSCs thereafter that soon reached a stable magnitude. This "slow" LIP of NMDAR EPSCs (LTPNMDA) was blocked by inhibiting exocytosis or actin polymerization in postsynaptic cells. By contrast, LTD of NMDAR EPSCs (LTDNMDA) was immediately inducible, and, although it was blocked by the actin stabilizer, it was unaffected by exocytosis or endocytosis inhibitors. Furthermore, concomitant changes in the decay time of NMDAR EPSCs suggested that differential switches in NR2 subunit composition accompanied LTPNMDA and LTDNMDA, and these changes were blocked by the calcium buffer BAPTA or an mGluR antagonist. Our results suggest that LTPNMDA and LTDNMDA utilize different NMDAR trafficking pathways and express different ratios of NMDAR subunits on the postsynaptic surface. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
The AAA+ ATPase Thorase Regulates AMPA Receptor-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity and Behavior

Jianmin Zhang,Yue Wang,Zhikai Chi,Matthew J. Keuss,Ying-Min Emily Pai,Ho Chul Kang,Joo-Ho Shin,Artem Bugayenko,Hong Wang,Yulan Xiong,Mikhail V. Pletnikov,Mark P. Mattson,Ted M. Dawson,Valina L. Dawson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.016

IF: 64.5

2011-01-01

Cell

Abstract:The synaptic insertion or removal of AMPA receptors (AMPAR) plays critical roles in the regulation of synaptic activity reflected in the expression of long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD). The cellular events underlying this important process in learning and memory are still being revealed. Here we describe and characterize the AAA(+) ATPase Thorase, which regulates the expression of surface AMPAR. In an ATPase-dependent manner Thorase mediates the internalization of AMPAR by disassembling the AMPAR-GRIP1 complex. Following genetic deletion of Thorase, the internalization of AMPAR is substantially reduced, leading to increased amplitudes of miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents, enhancement of LTP, and elimination of LTD. These molecular events are expressed as deficits in learning and memory in Thorase null mice. This study identifies an AAA(+) ATPase that plays a critical role in regulating the surface expression of AMPAR and thereby regulates synaptic plasticity and learning and memory.
The impact of subunit type, alternative splicing, and auxiliary proteins on AMPA receptor trafficking

Tyler Couch,Tyler McCullock,David M MacLean

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.18.629280

2024-12-20

Abstract:AMPA receptors underlie fast excitatory synaptic transmission in the mammalian nervous system and are critical for the expression of synaptic plasticity. Four genes encode the AMPA subunits, each subject to RNA editing and alternative splicing at multiple positions. In addition, each tetrameric AMPA receptor can harbor up to four auxiliary proteins, of which there are multiple types. Subunit type, alternative splicing, and auxiliary proteins are all known to affect AMPA receptor gating and trafficking. However, determining which factors dominate AMPA receptor trafficking requires high throughput assessment of trafficking across multiple conditions. Here, we deploy two such methods to assess the relative contribution of AMPA subunit type (GluA1 versus GluA2), alternative splicing (flip versus flop), and various transmembrane AMPA receptor regulatory proteins (TARPs) to AMPA receptor trafficking. We find that subunit type is the most important factor, with GluA2 showing much better surface expression than GluA1, and alternative splicing plays a secondary role, with flip subunits consistently outperforming flop variants in surface expression across all conditions. Type 1 TARPs (γ2-4 and γ8) enhance surface trafficking, while Type 2 TARPs (γ5 and γ7) reduced surface expression, although we could not detect differences within each type. These data will be a helpful resource in comparing surface expression across a variety of AMPA receptor compositions. Our assays will also enable high throughput assessment of novel disease-associated mutations, chimeras, and auxiliary and chaperone proteins.

Neuroscience
Direct imaging of lateral movements of AMPA receptors inside synapses

Catherine Tardin,Laurent Cognet,Cécile Bats,Brahim Lounis,Daniel Choquet

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdg463

2007-04-30

Abstract:Trafficking of AMPA receptors in and out of synapses is crucial for synaptic plasticity. Previous studies have focused on the role of endo/exocytosis processes or that of lateral diffusion of extra-synaptic receptors. We have now directly imaged AMPAR movements inside and outside synapses of live neurons using single-molecule fluorescence microscopy. Inside individual synapses, we found immobile and mobile receptors, which display restricted diffusion. Extra-synaptic receptors display free diffusion. Receptors could also exchange between these membrane compartments through lateral diffusion. Glutamate application increased both receptor mobility inside synapses and the fraction of mobile receptors present in a juxtasynaptic region. Block of inhibitory transmission to favor excitatory synaptic activity induced a transient increase in the fraction of mobile receptors and a decrease in the proportion of juxtasynaptic receptors. Altogether, our data show that rapid exchange of receptors between a synaptic and extra-synaptic localization occurs through regulation of receptor diffusion inside synapses.

Optics,Biological Physics
Arc/Arg3.1 function in long‐term synaptic plasticity: Emerging mechanisms and unresolved issues

Hongyu Zhang,Clive R. Bramham

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14958

IF: 3.698

2020-10-10

European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract:<p>Arc (activity‐regulated cytoskeleton‐associated protein) is posited as a critical regulator of long‐term synaptic plasticity at excitatory synapses, including long‐term potentiation, long‐term depression, inverse synaptic tagging, and homeostatic scaling, with pivotal roles in memory and postnatal cortical development. However, the mechanisms underlying the bidirectional regulation of synaptic strength are poorly understood. Here we review evidence from different plasticity paradigms, highlight outstanding issues and discuss stimulus‐specific mechanisms that dictate Arc function. We propose a model in which Arc bidirectionally controls synaptic strength by coordinate regulation of AMPA‐type glutamate receptor (AMPAR) trafficking and actin cytoskeletal dynamics in dendritic spines. Key to this model, Arc is proposed to function as an activity‐dependent regulator of AMPAR trapping and lateral membrane diffusion at synapses.</p>

neurosciences
Long-term potentiation reconstituted with an artificial TARP/PSD-95 complex

Anagh Sinha Ravi,Menglong Zeng,Xudong Chen,Gerardo Sandoval,Javier Diaz-Alonso,Mingjie Zhang,Roger A Nicoll,Roger A. Nicoll

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111483

IF: 8.8

2022-10-11

Cell Reports

Abstract:The critical role of AMPA receptor (AMPAR) trafficking in long-term potentiation (LTP) of excitatory synaptic transmission is now well established, but the underlying molecular mechanism is still uncertain. Recent research suggests that PSD-95 captures AMPARs via an interaction with the AMPAR auxiliary subunits-transmembrane AMPAR regulatory proteins (TARPs). To determine if such interaction is a core minimal component of the AMPAR trafficking and LTP mechanism, we engineered artificial binding partners, which individually were biochemically and functionally dead but which, when expressed together, rescue binding and both basal synaptic transmission and LTP. These findings establish the TARP/PSD-95 complex as an essential interaction underlying AMPAR trafficking and LTP.

cell biology
Rapid Spine Delivery and Redistribution of AMPA Receptors after Synaptic NMDA Receptor Activation.

Song-Hai Shi,Yasunori Hayashi,Ronald S. Petralia,Shahid H. Zaman,Robert J. Wenthold,Karel Svoboda,Roberto Malinow

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5421.1811

IF: 56.9

1999-01-01

Science

Abstract:To monitor changes in alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionate (AMPA) receptor distribution in living neurons, the AMPA receptor subunit GluR1 was tagged with green fluorescent protein (GFP). This protein (GluR1-GFP) was functional and was transiently expressed in hippocampal CA1 neurons. In dendrites visualized with two-photon laser scanning microscopy or electron microscopy, most of the GluR1-GFP was intracellular, mimicking endogenous GluR1 distribution. Tetanic synaptic stimulation induced a rapid delivery of tagged receptors into dendritic spines as well as clusters in dendrites. These postsynaptic trafficking events required synaptic N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor activation and may contribute to the enhanced AMPA receptor-mediatedtransmission observed during long-term potentiation and activity-dependent synaptic maturation.
Control of AMPA receptor activity by the extracellular loops of auxiliary proteins

Irene Riva,Clarissa Eibl,Rudolf Volkmer,Anna L Carbone,Andrew Jr Plested

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28680

IF: 7.7

2017-08-30

eLife

Abstract:At synapses throughout the mammalian brain, AMPA receptors form complexes with auxiliary proteins, including TARPs. However, how TARPs modulate AMPA receptor gating remains poorly understood. We built structural models of TARP-AMPA receptor complexes for TARPs γ2 and γ8, combining recent structural studies and de novo structure predictions. These models, combined with peptide binding assays, provide evidence for multiple interactions between GluA2 and variable extracellular loops of TARPs. Substitutions and deletions of these loops had surprisingly rich effects on the kinetics of glutamate-activated currents, without any effect on assembly. Critically, by altering the two interacting loops of γ2 and γ8, we could entirely remove all allosteric modulation of GluA2, without affecting formation of AMPA receptor-TARP complexes. Likewise, substitutions in the linker domains of GluA2 completely removed any effect of γ2 on receptor kinetics, indicating a dominant role for this previously overlooked site proximal to the AMPA receptor channel gate.
ACTIVITY-DEPENDENT INTERNALIZATION OF GLUN2B-CONTAINING NMDARS IS REQUIRED FOR SYNAPTIC INCORPORATION OF GLUN2A AND SYNAPTIC PLASTICITY

Granville P. Storey,Andres Barria

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.01.592099

2024-05-01

Abstract:NMDA-type glutamate receptors (NMDARs) are heterotetrameric complexes composed of two GluN1 and two GluN2 subunits. The precise composition of the GluN2 subunits determines the channel’s biophysical properties and influences its interaction with postsynaptic scaffolding proteins and signaling molecules involved in synaptic physiology and plasticity. Consequently, the precise regulation of NMDAR subunit composition at synapses is crucial for proper synaptogenesis, neuronal circuit development, and synaptic plasticity, a cellular model of memory formation. In the forebrain during early development, NMDARs contain the GluN2B subunit, which is necessary for proper synaptogenesis and synaptic plasticity. In rodents, GluN2A subunit expression begins in the second postnatal week, replacing GluN2B-containing NMDARs at synapses in an activity- or sensory experience-dependent process. This switch in NMDAR subunit composition at synapses alters channel properties and reduces synaptic plasticity. The molecular mechanism regulating the switch remains unclear. We have investigated the role of activity-dependent internalization of GluN2B-containing receptors in shaping synaptic NMDAR subunit composition. Using a combination of molecular, pharmacological, and electrophysiological approaches in cultured organotypic hippocampal slices from rats of both sexes, we show that the process of incorporating GluN2A-containing NMDARs receptors requires activity-dependent internalization of GluN2B-containing NMDARs. Interestingly, blockade of GluN2A synaptic incorporation was associated with impaired potentiation of AMPA-mediated synaptic transmission, suggesting a potential coupling between the trafficking of AMPARs into synapses and that of GluN2A-containing NMDARs. These insights contribute to our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying synaptic trafficking of glutamate receptors and synaptic plasticity. They may also have implications for therapeutic strategies targeting NMDAR function in neurological disorders.

Neuroscience
Perisynaptic Glur2-Lacking Ampa Receptors Control The Reversibility Of Synaptic And Spines Modifications

Yunlei Yang,Xiao-Bin Wang,Qiang Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0913004107

2010-01-01

Abstract:How persistent synaptic and spine modification is achieved is essential to our understanding of developmental refinement of neural circuitry and formation of memory. Within a short period after their induction, both types of modifications can either be stabilized or reversed, but how this reversibility is controlled is largely unknown. We have shown previously that AMPA receptors (AMPARs) are delivered to perisynaptic regions after the induction of long-term potentiation (LTP) but are absent from perisynaptic regions after the full expression of LTP. Here, we report that perisynaptic AMPARs are GluR2-lacking and they translocate to synapses in a protein kinase C (PKC)-dependent manner. Once entering synapses, these AMPARs quickly switch to GluR2-containing in an activity-dependent manner. Absence of postinduction activity or blocking interactions between GluR2 and NSF, or GluR2 and GRIP/PICK1 results in LTP mediated by GluR2-lacking AMPARs. However, these synaptic GluR2-lacking AMPARs are not sufficient to allow reversibility of LTP. On the other hand, postsynaptic inhibition of PKC activity holds AMPARs at perisynaptic regions. As long as perisynaptic AMPARs are present, both LTP and spine expansion remain labile: they can be reverted to the baseline state together with removal of perisynaptic AMPARs, or they can enter a stabilized state of persistent increase together with synaptic incorporation of perisynaptic AMPARs. Thus, perisynaptic GluR2-lacking AMPARs play a critical role in controlling the reversibility of both synaptic and spine modifications.
Subunit Composition of Synaptic AMPA Receptors Revealed by a Single-Cell Genetic Approach

Wei Lu,Yun Shi,Alexander C. Jackson,Kirsten Bjorgan,Matthew J. During,Rolf Sprengel,Peter H. Seeburg,Roger A. Nicoll

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.02.027

2009-01-01

Social Neuroscience

Abstract:The precise subunit composition of synaptic ionotropic receptors in the brain is poorly understood. This information is of particular importance with regard to AMPA-type glutamate receptors, the multimeric complexes assembled from GluA1-A4 subunits, as the trafficking of these receptors into and out of synapses is proposed to depend upon the subunit composition of the receptor. We report a molecular quantification of synaptic AMPA receptors (AMPARs) by employing a single-cell genetic approach coupled with electrophysiology in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. In contrast to prevailing views, we find that GluA1A2 heteromers are the dominant AMPARs at CA1 cell synapses (approximately 80%). In cells lacking GluA1, -A2, and -A3, synapses are devoid of AMPARs, yet synaptic NMDA receptors (NMDARs) and dendritic morphology remain unchanged. These data demonstrate a functional dissociation of AMPARs from trafficking of NMDARs and neuronal morphogenesis. This study provides a functional quantification of the subunit composition of AMPARs in the CNS and suggests novel roles for AMPAR subunits in receptor trafficking.

Subsynaptic positioning of AMPARs by LRRTM2 controls synaptic strength

Molecular Mechanisms of AMPA Receptor Trafficking in the Nervous System

Subunit-specific rules governing AMPA receptor trafficking to synapses in hippocampal pyramidal neurons.

Neuroligin-3 confines AMPA receptors into nanoclusters, thereby controlling synaptic strength at the calyx of Held synapses

The AMPA Receptor Code of Synaptic Plasticity

Molecular Mechanism of AMPA Receptor Modulation by TARP/Stargazin

Synapse specific and plasticity-regulated AMPAR mobility tunes synaptic integration

AMPA Receptor Surface Expression Is Regulated by S-Nitrosylation of Thorase and Transnitrosylation of NSF

The Synaptic Localization of NR2B-Containing NMDA Receptors is Controlled by Interactions with PDZ Proteins and AP-2

Subsynaptic Spatial Organization As a Regulator of Synaptic Strength and Plasticity

Distinct Trafficking and Expression Mechanisms Underlie Ltp and Ltd of Nmda Receptor-Mediated Synaptic Responses

The AAA+ ATPase Thorase Regulates AMPA Receptor-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity and Behavior

The impact of subunit type, alternative splicing, and auxiliary proteins on AMPA receptor trafficking

Direct imaging of lateral movements of AMPA receptors inside synapses

Arc/Arg3.1 function in long‐term synaptic plasticity: Emerging mechanisms and unresolved issues

Long-term potentiation reconstituted with an artificial TARP/PSD-95 complex

Rapid Spine Delivery and Redistribution of AMPA Receptors after Synaptic NMDA Receptor Activation.

Control of AMPA receptor activity by the extracellular loops of auxiliary proteins

ACTIVITY-DEPENDENT INTERNALIZATION OF GLUN2B-CONTAINING NMDARS IS REQUIRED FOR SYNAPTIC INCORPORATION OF GLUN2A AND SYNAPTIC PLASTICITY

Perisynaptic Glur2-Lacking Ampa Receptors Control The Reversibility Of Synaptic And Spines Modifications

Subunit Composition of Synaptic AMPA Receptors Revealed by a Single-Cell Genetic Approach