1-Year Results and Factors Associated with Treatment Responsiveness

Kumiko Hirayama,Manabu Yamamoto,Shigeru Honda,Akika Kyo,Norihiko Misawa,Takeya Kohno
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13154375
IF: 3.9
2024-07-27
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Abstract:Objective: To purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the 1-year outcomes and factors associated with the treatment responsiveness of switching to intravitreal brolucizumab (IVBR) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in Japanese patients refractory to ranibizumab or aflibercept using a treat and extend (TAE) regimen. Methods: A total of 48 eyes of 47 nAMD patients were switched to IVBR, and 36 eyes of 35 patients (27 males and 8 females) underwent 1-year treatment after the switch. Results: The rate of dry macula was significantly higher 12 months after the switch to IVBR (p < 0.001), with a significant decrease in the mean central macular thickness (CMT) and the mean central choroidal thickness (CCT) (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively). The injection interval was significantly extended from 7.0 ± 1.7 weeks to 10.3 ± 2.5 weeks 12 months after the switch (p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, a smaller number of prior anti-VEGF injections (p = 0.025; odds ratio: 0.947; 95% confidence interval: 0.903–0.994) and a pre-switching CCT of less than 250 μm (p = 0.023; odds ratio: 0.099; 95% confidence interval: 0.013–0.731) were associated with the good response group. Conclusions: These results suggest that IVBR may suppress disease activity and prolong the injection interval by switching for AMD patients with an insufficient response to treatment with ranibizumab and aflibercept.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?