Abstract:Operational risk assessment has received considerable attention in bank risk management. However, current assessment methods are primarily designed to assess the risk profile of individual banks. To enable cross-bank operational risk assessment, we propose an integrated AHP-DEA (analytic hierarchy process–data envelopment analysis) method. This method determines the importance of assessment criteria by calculating the weighted sum of rank votes after obtaining the importance values for specific rankings with DEA. This procedure replaces the pairwise comparisons in AHP and addresses the challenge of traditional AHPs in determining appropriate importance values when dealing with a large number of indicators. We applied this method to assess the operational risks of three Chinese commercial banks, and the empirical results indicate that this integrated AHP-DEA method is simple and user-friendly, making it suitable for cross-bank operational risk assessment.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main aim of this paper is to address the issue of cross-bank operational risk assessment in bank operational risk management. Specifically, the researchers propose a new integrated approach—combining Analytic Hierarchy Process and Data Envelopment Analysis (AHP-DEA)—to overcome the limitations of current operational risk assessment methods. These limitations include: 1. **Individual Bank-Oriented Assessment Methods**: Most existing assessment methods focus on the risk assessment of a single bank, lacking a comprehensive understanding of multiple banks or the entire banking industry. 2. **Challenges of Traditional AHP with Numerous Evaluation Criteria**: Although methods like AHP can be used for cross-bank risk assessment, it is difficult to determine appropriate weights when faced with a large number of evaluation criteria. 3. **Difficulty in Identifying Root Causes of Risk**: Existing methods, while reasonably measuring risk levels, struggle to identify the specific factors and types of risks that lead to these levels. To overcome the above challenges, the authors propose an integrated AHP-DEA method, which combines Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). The features of this method include: - **Systematic Assessment**: Allows for horizontal comparison of operational risks across multiple commercial banks. - **Simplified Weight Determination**: Utilizes DEA to determine the importance values of specific rankings and decides the importance values of criteria by calculating the weighted sum of votes, thus avoiding the complexity of weight determination in traditional AHP. - **Clear Identification of Risk Factors**: By analyzing the importance values obtained from DEA for each evaluation criterion, it is possible to clearly identify the contributing factors to risk and make recommendations accordingly. The paper also details the theoretical foundation and development process of this method and demonstrates its application process and effectiveness through a case study (operational risk assessment of three commercial banks in China). The ultimate goal is to provide bank management and regulatory agencies with a more comprehensive and accurate cross-bank operational risk assessment tool to support better decision-making.

Beyond Boundaries: The AHP-DEA Model for Holistic Cross-Banking Operational Risk Assessment

Performance evaluation of Chinese commercial banks by an improved slacks-based DEA model

Alternative Secondary Goals in Multiplicative Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis

A new approach for fair efficiency decomposition in two-stage structure system

A fuzzy multi-objective two-stage DEA model for evaluating the performance of US bank holding companies

Improved DEA Cross Efficiency Evaluation Method Based on Ideal and Anti-Ideal Points

The impact of uncertain financial risk on the operation efficiency of banks

Bank Performance Evaluation Based On A Modified Super-Efficiency Dea Measure

A New Resource Allocation Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Method in a Two-Stage Inverse Data Envelopment Analysis Framework for the Sustainable Development of Chinese Commercial Banks

Applying three-stage DEA on the operational performance of foreign banks in Taiwan

An Improved DEA Prospect Cross-Efficiency Evaluation Method and Its Application in Fund Performance Analysis

Constructing a robust data envelopment analysis model to evaluate the profitability efficiency of banks with financial loss

Evaluation of Bank Efficiency by Considering the Uncertainty of Nonperforming Loans

Enhancing group efficiency through two-stage data envelopment analysis with a modified common set of weights approach: an application in banking

Measuring slacks-based efficiency for commercial banks in China by using a two-stage DEA model with undesirable output

Modeling bank performance: A novel fuzzy two-stage DEA approach

Additive integer-valued data envelopment analysis with missing data: A multi-criteria evaluation approach

Group decision-making method of commercial bank risk monitoring based on PCbHA iteration

A mixed-integer network DEA with shared inputs and undesirable outputs for performance evaluation: Efficiency measurement of bank branches

Evaluating the impact of uncertainty and risk on the operational efficiency of credit business of commercial banks in China based on dynamic network DEA and Malmquist Index Model

Efficiency Evaluation of Banks with Many Branches using a Heuristic Framework and Dynamic Data Envelopment Optimization Approach: A Real Case Study