Comparison of Safety and Efficacy Between Ab Interno and Ab Externo Approaches to XEN Gel Stent Placement
Nicholas E Tan,Nathaniel Tracer,Anthony Terraciano,Hardik A Parikh,Joseph F Panarelli,Nathan M Radcliffe
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S292007
2021-01-27
Clinical Ophthalmology
Abstract:Nicholas E Tan, 1 Nathaniel Tracer, 2 Anthony Terraciano, 3 Hardik A Parikh, 2 Joseph F Panarelli, 2 Nathan M Radcliffe 4, 5 1 College of Medicine, State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA; 2 Department of Ophthalmology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA; 3 College of Arts and Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; 4 Department of Ophthalmology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; 5 New York Eye Surgery Center, Bronx, NY, USA Correspondence: Nathan M Radcliffe New York Eye Surgery Center, 1101 Pelham Parkway North, Bronx, NY, USA Tel +1 718 519 1000 Email drradcliffe@gmail.com Purpose: To compare the safety and efficacy of two different techniques for implantation of the XEN Gel Stent, a minimally invasive surgical device for the treatment of refractory glaucoma. Methods: A retrospective chart review of eyes that received ab interno or ab externo XEN Gel Stent placement from February 2017 to October 2019 was conducted. A single surgeon (NMR) performed all operations. Eyes that received the XEN implant concomitant with a glaucoma drainage device insertion or that were lost to 6-month follow-up were excluded. Intraocular pressure (IOP) change, change in glaucoma medications, frequency of slit lamp revision procedures, and frequency of secondary glaucoma surgeries were the primary outcomes compared between groups. Results: Fifty eyes that underwent ab interno placement and 30 eyes that underwent ab externo placement were studied. The ab interno cohort demonstrated a mean IOP reduction of 8.4 ± 1.7 mmHg (28.6% decrease) by 12 months, compared to a mean reduction of 12.8 ± 3.0 mmHg (40.1% decrease) in the ab externo group (p = 0.208). Mean reduction in medication use was 1.81 ± 0.29 medications in the ab interno group and 1.86 ± 0.37 in the ab externo group (p = 0.913). By 12 months, 58% of ab interno eyes had required 5-fluorouracil injection compared to 36.7% of ab externos (p = 0.105). Bleb needling was applied to 42% and 26.7% of the eyes, respectively (p = 0.231). A second glaucoma surgery was necessary for 20% of the ab interno cohort and 10% of the ab externo cohort (p = 0.351). Conclusion: There were no differences in outcomes between ab interno and ab externo placement of the XEN Gel Stent. Both approaches are safe and effective for lowering IOP. Keywords: MIGS, glaucoma surgery, bleb, subconjunctival stent, surgical technique