Randomized trial of patient outreach approaches to de-implement outdated colonoscopy surveillance intervals.
Jeffrey K. Lee,Pradeep C. Koripella,Christopher D. Jensen,Sophie A. Merchant,Jeffrey M. Fox,Suyi X. Chang,Christian H. Dang,Fernando S. Velayos,Eshandeep S. Boparai,Nicole S. Evans,Lawrence J. Leung,Jessica M. Badalov,Charles P. Quesenberry,Douglas A. Corley,Theodore R. Levin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2023.12.027
IF: 13.576
2024-01-08
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Abstract:Background and Aims Guidelines now recommend patients with low-risk adenomas receive colonoscopy surveillance in 7-10 years and those with the previously recommended 5-year interval be reevaluated. We tested three outreach approaches for transitioning patients to the 10-year interval recommendation. Methods Design : 3-arm pragmatic randomized trial comparing telephone, secure messaging, and mailed letter outreach. Setting : Kaiser Permanente Northern California, a large integrated healthcare system. Participants : Patients aged 54-70 years with 1-2 small (<10 mm) tubular adenomas at baseline colonoscopy, due for 5-year surveillance in 2022, without high-risk conditions, and with access to all three outreach modalities. Patients were randomly assigned to outreach arm (telephone [n=200], secure message [n=203], and mailed letter [n=201]) stratified by age, sex, race, and ethnicity. Intervention : Outreach in each arm was performed by trained medical assistants (unblinded) communicating in English with 1 reminder attempt at 2-4 weeks. Participants could change their assigned interval to 10 years or continue their planned 5-year interval. Results 60-day response rates were higher for telephone (64.5%) and secure messaging outreach (51.7%) versus mailed letter (31.3%). Also, more patients adopted the 10-year surveillance interval in the telephone (37.0%) and secure messaging arms (32.0%) compared to mailed letter (18.9%) and rate differences were significant for telephone (18.1%; 97.5% CI: 8.3%, 27.9%) and secure message outreach (13.1%; 97.5% CI: 3.5%, 22.7%) versus mailed letter outreach. Conclusion Telephone and secure messaging were more effective than mailed letter outreach for de-implementing outdated colonoscopy surveillance recommendations among individuals with a history of low-risk adenomas in an integrated healthcare setting.
gastroenterology & hepatology