Abstract:Rationale and Objectives To assess the consistency between ultrasound and dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for the diagnosis of gout in the knee joint. Materials and Methods The ultrasound and DECT images of 176 knee joints from 167 patients diagnosed with gout at the Gout Specialty Clinic of Qingdao University Affiliated Hospital from February 2022 to December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The knee joint was segmented into five anatomical regions: intra-articular, anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral. The location of monosodium urate (MSU) crystal deposition was recorded. Tophi were classified as hypoechogenic, isoechogenic, hyperechogenic, or strongly echogenic. The Kappa test was used to assess the consistency between the two examination methods in different regions of the knee joint. The McNemar chi-square test was utilized to conduct a differential analysis between the DECT and ultrasound results. The chi-square test was used to assess differences in the rate of tophi detection with different echogenicities by DECT. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to assess the correlation between MSU crystal deposition volume and clinically relevant indicators. Results Double contour (61.4%) was the most common intra-articular ultrasound sign. In the extra-articular region, MSU crystals were commonly deposited in and around the popliteal groove region (ultrasound: 52.3%; DECT: 60.0%). Corresponding MSU deposits on DECT were found in 7 of 54 joints with aggregates detected on ultrasound, and in 15 of 108 joints with DC. Tophi with hyperechogenicity or strong echogenicity were more likely to be detected on DECT than those with hypoechoic or isoechoic features (84.3% and 90.9% vs. 55.1% and 27.8%, respectively). For the assessment of MSU deposits, ultrasound showed an overall higher positive rate than DECT (81.1% vs. 72.2%), with poor consistency between the two examinations ( κ = 0.177). In distinct anatomical regions, ultrasound and DECT showed high consistency in the medial ( κ = 0.651) and lateral ( κ = 0.705) views, with no significant difference. The intra-articular ( κ = 0.316) and anterior ( κ = 0.346) regions exhibited only fair consistency, with statistically significant diagnostic differences. When exclusively assessing cases with tophi, ultrasound and DECT demonstrated similar consistency in the medial, lateral and anterior views ( κ = 0.633, 0.712, and 0.400, respectively), with statistically significant differences. In the intra-articular region, the consistency was reduced ( κ = 0.237), and the differences were statistically significant. Conclusion Ultrasound and DECT are effective methods to detect MSU deposition in gout of the knee. However, the consistency between the two techniques varies in different anatomical locations. Clinical assessment should be tailored based on the specific anatomical position. DECT is advantageous for the evaluation of intra-articular MSU deposits, while ultrasound is more sensitive for the early detection of scattered MSU deposits.

Diagnostic value of different imaging features for patients with suspected gout: A network meta-analysis

The Role of Advanced Imaging in Gout Management

Performance of Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Gout in a Multicenter Study: Comparison With Monosodium Urate Monohydrate Crystal Analysis as the Gold Standard

Concordance of Ultrasound and Dual-Energy CT in Diagnosing Gouty Arthritis in the Knee Joint: A Retrospective Observational Study

Detection of Uric Acid Crystal Deposition by Ultrasonography and Dual-Energy Computed Tomography

Dual energy CT findings in gout with rapid kilovoltage-switching source with gemstone scintillator detector

Gout of feet and ankles in different disease durations: diagnostic value of single-source DECT and evaluation of urate deposition with a novel semi-quantitative DECT scoring system

Systemic staging for urate crystal deposits with dual-energy CT and ultrasound in patients with suspected gout

Unravelling the mysteries of gout by multimodality imaging

Single source dual-energy computed tomography in the diagnosis of gout: Diagnostic reliability in comparison to digital radiography and conventional computed tomography of the feet

The value of musculoskeletal ultrasound in predicting gout flares in index joints: A prospective cohort study of people with gout starting urate-lowering therapy

Identification of monosodium urate crystal deposits in patients with asymptomatic hyperuricemia using dual-energy CT

Diagnostic Performance of Dual-energy CT Versus Ultrasonography in Gout: A Meta-analysis

Dual-energy computed tomography has limited sensitivity for non-tophaceous gout: a comparison study with tophaceous gout

Role of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography in the Identification of Monosodium Urate Deposition in Gout Patients: A Comprehensive Analysis of 828 Joints According to Structural Joint Damage

Dual-Energy Computed Tomography for Gout Diagnosis and Management

The application of dual-energy computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute gouty arthritis

Imaging in gout - What can we learn from MRI, CT, DECT and US?

Ultrasonography and dual-energy computed tomography provide different quantification of urate burden in gout: results from a cross-sectional study

[Study on the Deposition of Monosodium Urate in Patients with First-Episode of Acute Gouty Arthritis by Dual Energy CT].

Relationship between structural joint damage and urate deposition in gout: a plain radiography and dual-energy CT study