The impact of a statewide insulin copay cap policy for insured patients with diabetes in Utah
Niying Li,Rupesh Panchal,Theodoros Giannouchos,Raymond J Pan,Danielle Nguyen,Robert Nohavec,Laura Britton,Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk,Joseph Biskupiak,Adam Wilson,Diana Brixner,Raymond J. Pan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.2.112
2024-02-03
Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Insulin affordability is a huge concern for patients with diabetes in the United States. On March 30, 2020, Utah signed House Bill 207 into law, aimed at capping copayments for insulin at $30 for a 30-day supply. The bill was enacted on January 1, 2021.OBJECTIVE: To assess patient basal insulin adherence, out-of-pocket costs, health plan costs, total costs on insulin, and hemoglobin A1c (A1c) in prepolicy vs postpolicy periods.METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis using data from a regional health plan in Utah from October 1, 2019, to September 30, 2021. Inclusion criteria were fully enrolled members of all ages, under commercial insurance, with at least 1 fill for any type of insulin in both the preperiod and the postperiod. Adherence was measured by proportion of days covered (PDC). Paired t-tests and Wilcoxon sign rank tests were conducted to compare the health and economic outcomes.RESULTS: Out of 24,150 commercially insured individuals, a total of 244 patients were included. Across all 244 patients, there was a significant decline in monthly median out-of-pocket costs of insulin by 58.5% (<i>P</i> < 0.001), whereas the monthly median health plan costs of insulin increased by 22.0% (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The total monthly costs of insulin (the sum of out-of-pocket and health plan costs) were unchanged (<i>P</i> = 0.115). Only 74 patients with enough basal insulin fills in both periods were included in the analysis for PDC changes. PDC change was not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.43). Among the 74 patients with PDC calculations, 29 patients had A1c recorded in both periods. The change in A1c was not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.23).CONCLUSIONS: An insulin copayment max of $30 in Utah demonstrated lower patient out-of-pocket costs, subsidized by the health plan. PDC did not change, and HbA1c did not improve. An assessment of a longer period and on a larger population is needed.
pharmacology & pharmacy,health care sciences & services