FinTech and financial instability. Is this time different?

Stefanos Ioannou,Dariusz Wójcik,Michael Urban
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2024.2315055
2024-04-03
Journal of Post Keynesian Economics
Abstract:We study the development of FinTech, defined as a set of innovations and an economic sector that apply recently developed digital technologies to financial services, with particular focus on payment and lending platforms, and digital asset management and online trading apps. We use mixed methods, including a theoretical exercise on the main balance sheet interactions involved in FinTech banking, and empirical insights from fieldwork in Latin America and the United States. Our analysis corroborates previous literature identifying several systemic risks in FinTech payment and lending platforms. These include the enhanced risk of a bank run, the increase in liquidity risk for incumbent banks, the fueling of precarious lending, and the potential compromise in the efficacy of monetary policy. Our discussion of online asset management and trading apps also highlights the risk of enhanced volatility in financial markets due to the increase in the participation of low-income and inexperienced investors. We observe that while the FinTech sector is still small in size, it already contains seeds of financial instability which should be all-too-familiar from recent history.
economics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper discusses the impact of financial technology (FinTech) on financial stability, especially in the areas of payment and lending platforms, as well as digital asset management and online trading applications. The study adopts a mixed-method approach, including theoretical analysis and field research, primarily focused on Latin America and the United States. The authors point out that although FinTech currently has a small scale, it has shown systemic risks that could lead to financial instability. The article identifies several potential issues with FinTech payment and lending platforms, such as increased bank run risk, enhanced liquidity risk for traditional banks, fueling unstable lending, and potentially weakening the effectiveness of monetary policy. In addition, online asset management and trading applications may exacerbate financial market volatility due to the increase of low-income and inexperienced investors. The research also finds that despite views that FinTech can challenge traditional banks and promote financial inclusion, in reality, many FinTech companies closely collaborate with traditional banks, and regulatory authorities also encourage FinTech to enhance banking competition and inclusiveness. However, the relationship between FinTech and financial stability has not been adequately studied, especially outside of the realm of cryptocurrencies. The paper reveals the characteristics of FinTech in terms of balance sheet interactions through theoretical analysis and empirical data, and compares it with post-Keynesian endogenous money theory. The study emphasizes the risks that FinTech may bring and suggests the need to pay attention to the impact of these emerging technologies on the stability of the financial system.