Abstract:Background: For medical artificial intelligence (AI) training and validation, human expert labels are considered the gold standard that represents the correct answers or desired outputs for a given data set. These labels serve as a reference or benchmark against which the model's predictions are compared. Objective: This study aimed to assess the accuracy of a custom deep learning (DL) algorithm on classifying diabetic retinopathy (DR) and further demonstrate how label errors may contribute to this assessment in a nationwide DR-screening program. Methods: Fundus photographs from the Lifeline Express, a nationwide DR-screening program, were analyzed to identify the presence of referable DR using both (1) manual grading by National Health Service England-certificated graders and (2) a DL-based DR-screening algorithm with validated good lab performance. To assess the accuracy of labels, a random sample of images with disagreement between the DL algorithm and the labels was adjudicated by ophthalmologists who were masked to the previous grading results. The error rates of labels in this sample were then used to correct the number of negative and positive cases in the entire data set, serving as postcorrection labels. The DL algorithm's performance was evaluated against both pre- and postcorrection labels. Results: The analysis included 736,083 images from 237,824 participants. The DL algorithm exhibited a gap between the real-world performance and the lab-reported performance in this nationwide data set, with a sensitivity increase of 12.5% (from 79.6% to 92.5%, P<.001) and a specificity increase of 6.9% (from 91.6% to 98.5%, P<.001). In the random sample, 63.6% (560/880) of negative images and 5.2% (140/2710) of positive images were misclassified in the precorrection human labels. High myopia was the primary reason for misclassifying non-DR images as referable DR images, while laser spots were predominantly responsible for misclassified referable cases. The estimated label error rate for the entire data set was 1.2%. The label correction was estimated to bring about a 12.5% enhancement in the estimated sensitivity of the DL algorithm (P<.001). Conclusions: Label errors based on human image grading, although in a small percentage, can significantly affect the performance evaluation of DL algorithms in real-world DR screening.

Using artificial intelligence reading label system in diabetic retinopathy grading training of junior ophthalmology residents and medical students

The effectiveness of artificial intelligence-based automated grading and training system in education of manual detection of diabetic retinopathy

The application and value evaluation of assisted diagnosis system for five fundus lesion based on artificial intelligence combined with optical coherence tomography

Validation of artificial intelligence algorithm in the detection and staging of diabetic retinopathy through fundus photography: An automated tool for detection and grading of diabetic retinopathy

Automatic Grading System for Diabetic Retinopathy Diagnosis Using Deep Learning Artificial Intelligence Software

Application Research of Artificial Intelligence Screening System for Diabetic Retinopathy

An Artificial-Intelligence- and Telemedicine-Based Screening Tool to Identify Glaucoma Suspects from Color Fundus Imaging

Clinical Features Distinguishing Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Using Artificial Intelligence

Test accuracy of artificial intelligence-based grading of fundus images in diabetic retinopathy screening: A systematic review

Using artificial intelligence to improve human performance: efficient retinal disease detection training with synthetic images

Evaluation of AI-Enhanced Non-Mydriatic Fundus Photography for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening

Application of artificial intelligence aided diagnosis system of fundus images in the clinical teaching of ophthalmology postgraduates

Development of an artificial intelligence system to classify pathology and clinical features on retinal fundus images

Evaluating a Deep Learning Diabetic Retinopathy Grading System Developed on Mydriatic Retinal Images When Applied to Non-Mydriatic Community Screening

The Validation of Deep Learning-Based Grading Model for Diabetic Retinopathy

Accuracy of Autonomous Artificial Intelligence-Based Diabetic Retinopathy Screening in Real-Life Clinical Practice

Artificial intelligence-based pathologic myopia identification system in the ophthalmology residency training program

An Automated Grading System for Detection of Vision-Threatening Referable Diabetic Retinopathy on the Basis of Color Fundus Photographs

Impact of Gold-Standard Label Errors on Evaluating Performance of Deep Learning Models in Diabetic Retinopathy Screening: Nationwide Real-World Validation Study

An Evaluation System of Fundus Photograph-Based Intelligent Diagnostic Technology for Diabetic Retinopathy and Applicability for Research

Application of artificial intelligence-based dual-modality analysis combining fundus photography and optical coherence tomography in diabetic retinopathy screening in a community hospital