Analytical and behavioral characterization of 1‐dodecanoyl‐LSD (1DD‐LSD)

Pierce V. Kavanagh,Folker Westphal,Benedikt Pulver,Simon P. Elliott,Alexander Stratford,Adam L. Halberstadt,Simon D. Brandt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.3691

2024-04-05

Drug Testing and Analysis

Abstract:The development of novel lysergamides provides new opportunities for extending the understanding of their structure–activity relationships. At the same time, numerous N1‐alkylcarbonyl derivatives of LSD emerged as recreational drugs. This study presents analytical and pharmacological data obtained for 1‐dodecanoyl‐LSD (1DD‐LSD), a novel N1‐acylated LSD derivative. The mouse head‐twitch response data confirmed that 1DD‐LSD produces LSD‐like effects though the increased N1‐acyl chain length led to noticeable reduction in potency (ED50 = 3.60 μmol/kg) compared to lower homologues. 1‐Acetyl‐N,N‐diethyllysergamide (1A‐LSD, ALD‐52) was first synthesized in the 1950s and found to produce psychedelic effects similar to those of LSD. Evidence suggests that ALD‐52 serves as a prodrug in vivo and hydrolysis to LSD is likely responsible for its activity. Extension of the N1‐alkylcarbonyl chain gives rise to novel lysergamides, which spurred further investigations into their structure–activity relationships. At the same time, ALD‐52 and numerous homologues have emerged as recreational drugs ("research chemicals") that are available from online vendors. In the present study, 1‐dodecanoyl‐LSD (1DD‐LSD), a novel N1‐acylated LSD derivative, was subjected to analytical characterization and was also tested in the mouse head‐twitch response (HTR) assay to assess whether it produces LSD‐like effects in vivo. When tested in C57BL/6J mice, 1DD‐LSD induced the HTR with a median effective dose (ED50) of 2.17 mg/kg, which was equivalent to 3.60 μmol/kg. Under similar experimental conditions, LSD has 27‐fold higher potency than 1DD‐LSD in the HTR assay. Previous work has shown that other homologues such as ALD‐52 and 1‐propanoyl‐LSD also have considerably higher potency than 1DD‐LSD in mice, which suggests that hydrolysis of the 1‐dodecanoyl moiety may be comparatively less efficient in vivo. Further investigations are warranted to determine whether the increased lipophilicity of 1DD‐LSD causes it to be sequestered in fat, thereby reducing its exposure to enzymatic hydrolysis in plasma and tissues. Further clinical studies are also required to assess its activity in humans and to test the prediction that it could potentially serve as a long‐acting prodrug for LSD.

pharmacology & pharmacy,biochemical research methods,chemistry, analytical