Impact of Antifungal Prophylaxis Continuation or Discontinuation after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant on the incidence of Invasive Mold Infection

Justine Abella Ross,Brian Lee,Huiyan Ma,Bernard Tegtmeier,Deepa Nanayakkara,Jana Dickter,Ricardo Spielberger,Eileen Smith,Vinod Pullarkat,Stephen J Forman,Randy Taplitz,Ryotaro Nakamura,Monzr Al Malki,Sanjeet Singh Dadwal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae409
2024-07-23
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Abstract:Abstract Background Continuing antifungal prophylaxis (AFPx) to prevent invasive mold infections (IMI) in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) recipients after primary hospital discharge from alloHCT admission varies among transplant centers despite recommendations to continue prophylaxis through day (D)+75. Characteristics driving AFPx prescribing at hospital discharge and outcomes are unknown. Methods In this retrospective analysis, we reviewed patients continuing AFPx vs. no AFPx at hospital discharge. We included patients with a hospital stay (LOS) > 7 days (d) and < 40d. We excluded patients with a history of IMI prior to alloHCT, new IMI during admission, or deceased prior to discharge. Our primary objective was incidence of probable or proven IMI per EORTC/MSGERC. Our secondary objectives were non-relapse mortality (NRM) at D+100, overall survival (OS) at D+100, and characteristics driving AFPx discontinuation at hospital discharge. Results Of the 430 patients identified, 387 patients met inclusion criteria. Fifty-six percent (217/387) continued AFPx vs. 44% (170/387) had no AFPx at discharge. At D+100: 3 probable IMI cases occurred in the group with continued AFPx vs. 1 probable IMI in the no AFPx group (no proven IMI). Univariate analysis showed no difference in cumulative incidence of probable IMI (p=0.440), NRM (p=0.072), and OS (p=0.855) between groups. Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that patients were less likely to continue AFPx if non-AML diagnosis, LOS ≤ 30d, acute GVHD 0-1 grade, and corticosteroid use ≤ 5d. Conclusion No difference in probable IMI at D+100 after alloHCT based on continuing versus discontinuing AFPx at hospital discharge after alloHCT admission supports risk-adapted prophylaxis approach.
immunology,infectious diseases,microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?