On the statistical foundation of a recent single molecule FRET benchmark

Ayush Saurabh,Lance W. Q. Xu,Steve Pressé
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47733-3
IF: 16.6
2024-05-01
Nature Communications
Abstract:Nature Communications, Published online: 30 April 2024; doi:10.1038/s41467-024-47733-3 On the statistical foundation of a recent single molecule FRET benchmark
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve lies in some statistical fundamental problems in the existing single - molecule FRET (Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer) benchmark tests. Specifically, the paper points out that a benchmark test published by Götz et al. in "Nature Communications" compared the performance of multiple FRET analysis tools, but this benchmark test used simplified data - generation processes, which failed to fully reflect the physical characteristics in actual FRET experiments, such as Poisson shot noise and detector crosstalk. This simplified data - generation method led to a preference for those FRET tools whose assumptions match the simplified data - generation process, thus creating a bias and wrongly estimating the uncertainty of parameters. The authors demonstrate this problem by re - evaluating the performance of two tools that performed well in the original benchmark test - Hidden - Markury and MASH - FRET - on data containing actual FRET characteristics. The results show that when tested with data containing Poisson shot noise and detector crosstalk, tools based on the Gaussian noise model perform poorly, while the Hidden Markov Model (HMM) with the standard Poisson noise model performs better. In addition, the paper also explores the impact of spectral crosstalk on FRET efficiency estimation, further demonstrating the limitations of the existing benchmark tests. In conclusion, this paper aims to emphasize the flaws in current FRET benchmark tests, namely, over - relying on simplified data - generation models, which may lead to unfair evaluations of certain tools. Therefore, the authors suggest designing more comprehensive benchmark tests to more accurately assess the ability of different FRET analysis tools to handle actual experimental data.