The Persistent Paradox of Rapid Eye Movement Sleep (REMS): Brain Waves and Dreaming

J. F. Pagel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14070622

IF: 3.333

2024-06-22

Brain Sciences

Abstract:The original conceptualization of REM sleep as paradoxical sleep was based on its EEG resembling wakefulness and its association with dreaming. Over time, the concept of paradox was expanded to include various associations with REM sleep, such as dream exclusivity, high recall, and pathophysiology. However, none of these associations are unique to REM sleep; they can also occur in other sleep states. Today, after more than fifty years of focused research, two aspects of REMS clearly retain paradoxical exclusivity. Despite the persistent contention that the EEG of human REMS consists of wake-like, low-voltage, non-synchronous electrical discharges, REMS is based on and defined by the intracranial electrical presence of 5–8 Hz. theta, which has always been the marker of REMS in other animals. The wake-like EEG used to define REMS on human polysomnography is secondary to a generalized absence of electrophysiological waveforms because the strong waves of intracranial theta do not propagate to scalp electrodes placed outside the skull. It is a persistent paradox that the theta frequency is restricted to a cyclical intracranial dynamic that does not extend beyond the lining of the brain. REMS has a persistent association with narratively long and salient dream reports. However, the extension of this finding to equate REMS with dreaming led to a foundational error in neuroscientific logic. Major theories and clinical approaches were built upon this belief despite clear evidence that dreaming is reported throughout sleep in definingly different physiologic and phenomenological forms. Few studies have addressed the differences between the dreams reported from the different stages of sleep so that today, the most paradoxical aspect of REMS dreaming may be how little the state has actually been studied. An assessment of the differences in dreaming between sleep stages could provide valuable insights into how dreaming relates to the underlying brain activity and physiological processes occurring during each stage. The brain waves and dreams of REMS persist as being paradoxically unique and different from waking and the other states of sleep consciousness.

neurosciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily explores two persistent paradoxes in Rapid Eye Movement Sleep (REMS): brainwave activity and dream experience.

First, the paper discusses the paradox of brainwave activity in REMS. The electroencephalogram (EEG) characteristics of REMS were initially thought to be low voltage, desynchronized discharges similar to the waking state, which contradicts the clear 5-8Hz θ waves observed in animal models. The reason why the EEG of human REMS appears to lack synchrony is that θ waves are difficult to penetrate the skull and be captured by electrodes on the scalp. Through intracranial recording techniques, researchers have found that similar θ wave patterns to those in animal models also exist during human REMS.

Secondly, regarding the association between REMS and dreams, the paper points out another paradox. Although it has long been widely believed that REMS is equivalent to the time when dreams occur, increasing research indicates that dreams are not limited to the REMS stage and can be reported in other sleep stages. Moreover, individuals can experience dreams even in the absence of REMS; conversely, no dream content may be reported during REMS. These findings challenge the traditional view that REM sleep is the time when dreams occur.

In summary, the paper attempts to address the nature of brainwave activity in REMS and the relationship between REMS and dreams, revealing paradoxes in both aspects. By reviewing and analyzing relevant research, the authors aim to clarify some fundamental concepts of REMS and provide new perspectives for further exploration of its underlying neural mechanisms.