Emergency Medical Services Prehospital Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in the US: A Brief Literature Review
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S366006
2022-05-30
Open Access Emergency Medicine
Abstract:Christian Angelo I Ventura, 1– 3 Edward E Denton, 3– 5 Jessica Anastacia David, 6 Brianna J Schoenfelder, 7 Lillian Mela, 8 Rebecca P Lumia, 9 Rachel B Rudi, 3 Barnita Haldar 3, 10 1 Department of Graduate Medical Sciences, Boston University School of Medicine Boston, Boston, MA, USA; 2 Department of Health, Behavior and Society (Incoming), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA; 3 EMS Pandemic Response Research Laboratory Lawrenceville, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA; 4 Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Little Rock, Little Rock, AR, USA; 5 Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Little Rock, Little Rock, AR, USA; 6 Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Rutgers University New Brunswick, Brunswick, NJ, USA; 7 Department of Neuroscience, Temple University Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 8 Department of Nursing, Simmons University Boston, Boston, MA, USA; 9 Department of Biology, Northeastern University Boston, Boston, MA, USA; 10 Department of Cell, Developmental, and Integrative Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA Correspondence: Christian Angelo I Ventura, Tel +1 (732) 372-2141, Email ; This study aimed to analyze prehospital Emergency Medical Services (EMS) response to the COVID-19 pandemic in the US through a brief systematic review of available literature in context with international prehospital counterparts. An exploration of the NCBI repository was performed using a search string of relevant keywords which returned n=5128 results; articles that met the inclusion criteria (n=77) were reviewed and analyzed in accordance with PRISMA and PROSPERO recommendations. Methodical quality was assessed using critical appraisal tools, and the Egger's test was used for risk of bias reduction upon linear regression analysis of a funnel plot. Sources of heterogeneity as defined by P 50% were interrogated. Findings were considered within ten domains: structural/systemic; clinical outcomes; clinical assessment; treatment; special populations; dispatch/activation; education; mental health; perspectives/experiences; and transport. Findings suggest, EMS clinicians have likely made significant and unmeasured contributions to care during the pandemic via nontraditional roles, ie, COVID-19 testing and vaccine deployment. EMS plays a critical role in counteracting the COVID-19 pandemic in addition to the worsening opioid epidemic, both of which disproportionately impact patients of color. As such, being uniquely influential on clinical outcomes, these providers may benefit from standardized education on care and access disparities such as racial identity. Access to distance learning continuing education opportunities may increase rates of provider recertification. Additionally, there is a high prevalence of vaccine hesitancy among surveyed nationally registered EMS providers. Continued rigorous investigation on the impact of COVID-19 on EMS systems and personnel is warranted to ensure informed preparation for future pandemic and infectious disease responses. Keywords: EMS, COVID-19, prehospital, pandemic response, EMT, paramedic Prehospital clinical care under the purview of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) has been traditionally understudied in the United States, as illustrated by the scarcity of literature as compared to other allied health professions. Under the federal oversight of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), EMS models of care vary drastically, shaped largely by geographic assignment, local community partners, and additional presiding authorities. Common models include municipality-based, private nonprofit, and private for-profit services. 1 Within these structural differences exist a subset variance of agencies' scope of practice. In accordance with the National EMS Scope of Practice Model, the Basic Life Support (BLS) scope extends to Emergency Medical Responders (EMRs) and Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs), while the Advanced Life Support (ALS) scope is characteristic of Advanced EMTs (AEMTs) and Paramedics (EMT-Ps). 2 As of January 2022, COVID-19, the respiratory infection caused by novel SARS-CoV-2, is a leading cause of death in the US. 3 This global pandemic has established an unprecedented call for rigorous investigation of resource capacity and competency amid allied health care industries to ascertain structural deficits and strengths that have implications for future pandemic response. Further, preliminary mixed-method studies on EMS pandemi -Abstract Truncated-