Connecting neuronal circuits for movement

Silvia Arber,Rui M Costa,Rui M. Costa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat5994

IF: 56.9

2018-06-29

Science

Abstract:Dedicated neuronal circuits mediate execution, choice, and coordination of body action

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The Hierarchical Circuit for Executive Control of Movement

Brian R. Noga,Ioan Opris

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29674-6_5

2017-01-01

Abstract:A major challenge in neuroscience research is the understanding of the vast universe of human brain and its mind. In this context, the ability of the mind to control behavior relies upon the executive control of movement. Herein, we focus on the hierarchical circuitry of the brain that exercises the executive control of movement. This executive mechanism spans hierarchically over frontal/parietal/temporal cortices, subcortical structures in basal ganglia and thalamus, brainstem and spinal cord. To address the hierarchical executive mechanism of movement, we will examine its frontal/parietal cortical microcircuits interconnected in thalamo-cortical loops via cortico-striatal projections, and further to the mesencephalic locomotor region and central pattern generators in the spinal cord for locomotor control. Spinal locomotor circuits are enabled by parallel activation/modulation from descending reticulospinal and monoaminergic pathways. The use of various stimulation approaches developed recently is examined in terms of preclinical (animal experiments) and clinical applications to human brain disorders. Future clinical studies on the pathological aspects of movement will employ novel, deep brain stimulation that is capable to function in a closed-loop manner, adjusting therapy delivery to the patient’s level of disease impairment.
Brainstem Circuits for Locomotion

Roberto Leiras,Jared M Cregg,Ole Kiehn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-082321-025137

2022-07-08

Abstract:Locomotion is a universal motor behavior that is expressed as the output of many integrated brain functions. Locomotion is organized at several levels of the nervous system, with brainstem circuits acting as the gate between brain areas regulating innate, emotional, or motivational locomotion and executive spinal circuits. Here we review recent advances on brainstem circuits involved in controlling locomotion. We describe how delineated command circuits govern the start, speed, stop, and steering of locomotion. We also discuss how these pathways interface between executive circuits in the spinal cord and diverse brain areas important for context-specific selection of locomotion. A recurrent theme is the need to establish a functional connectome to and from brainstem command circuits. Finally, we point to unresolved issues concerning the integrated function of locomotor control.
Integrating across behaviors and timescales to understand the neural control of movement

Jimmie M. Gmaz,Jason A. Keller,Joshua T. Dudman,Juan A. Gallego

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2024.102843

IF: 7.07

2024-02-15

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract:The nervous system evolved to enable navigation throughout the environment in the pursuit of resources. Evolutionarily newer structures allowed increasingly complex adaptations but necessarily added redundancy. A dominant view of movement neuroscientists is that there is a one-to-one mapping between brain region and function. However, recent experimental data is hard to reconcile with the most conservative interpretation of this framework, suggesting a degree of functional redundancy during the performance of well-learned, constrained behaviors. This apparent redundancy likely stems from the bidirectional interactions between the various cortical and subcortical structures involved in motor control. We posit that these bidirectional connections enable flexible interactions across structures that change depending upon behavioral demands, such as during acquisition, execution or adaptation of a skill. Observing the system across both multiple actions and behavioral timescales can help isolate the functional contributions of individual structures, leading to an integrated understanding of the neural control of movement.

neurosciences
A neural circuit state change underlying skilled movements

Mark J Wagner,Joan Savall,Oscar Hernandez,Gabriel Mel,Hakan Inan,Oleg Rumyantsev,Jérôme Lecoq,Tony Hyun Kim,Jin Zhong Li,Charu Ramakrishnan,Karl Deisseroth,Liqun Luo,Surya Ganguli,Mark J Schnitzer,Mark J. Wagner,Mark J. Schnitzer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.06.001

IF: 64.5

2021-07-01

Cell

Abstract:Targeted arm-reaching using a robotic manipulandum as a learned motor task for miceCerebellar climbing fibers develop millimeter-scale synchronization during learningCerebellum to olive feedback regulates synchronized spiking and reach targetingModel of coupled phase oscillators explains bifurcation in climbing fiber dynamicsIn motor neuroscience, state changes are hypothesized to time-lock neural assemblies coordinating complex movements, but evidence for this remains slender. We tested whether a discrete change from more autonomous to coherent spiking underlies skilled movement by imaging cerebellar Purkinje neuron complex spikes in mice making targeted forelimb-reaches. As mice learned the task, millimeter-scale spatiotemporally coherent spiking emerged ipsilateral to the reaching forelimb, and consistent neural synchronization became predictive of kinematic stereotypy. Before reach onset, spiking switched from more disordered to internally time-locked concerted spiking and silence. Optogenetic manipulations of cerebellar feedback to the inferior olive bi-directionally modulated neural synchronization and reaching direction. A simple model explained the reorganization of spiking during reaching as reflecting a discrete bifurcation in olivary network dynamics. These findings argue that to prepare learned movements, olivo-cerebellar circuits enter a self-regulated, synchronized state promoting motor coordination. State changes facilitating behavioral transitions may generalize across neural systems.<ol class="links-for-figure"><li><a class="anchor download-link u-font-sans" href="https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0092867421007029-fx1_lrg.jpg">Download : Download high-res image (215KB)</a></li><li><a class="anchor download-link u-font-sans" href="https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0092867421007029-fx1.jpg">Download : Download full-size image</a></li></ol>

cell biology,biochemistry & molecular biology
Deconstruction of Corticospinal Circuits for Goal-Directed Motor Skills

Xuhua Wang,Yuanyuan Liu,Xinjian Li,Zicong Zhang,Hengfu Yang,Yu Zhang,Philip R. Williams,Noaf S. A. Alwahab,Kush Kapur,Bin Yu,Yiming Zhang,Mengying Chen,Haixia Ding,Charles R. Gerfen,Kuan Hong Wang,Zhigang He

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.014

IF: 64.5

2017-01-01

Cell

Abstract:Corticospinal neurons (CSNs) represent the direct cortical outputs to the spinal cord and play important roles in motor control across different species. However, their organizational principle remains unclear. By using a retrograde labeling system, we defined the requirement of CSNs in the execution of a skilled forelimb food-pellet retrieval task in mice. In vivo imaging of CSN activity during performance revealed the sequential activation of topographically ordered functional ensembles with moderate local mixing. Region-specific manipulations indicate that CSNs from caudal or rostral forelimb area control reaching or grasping, respectively, and both are required in the transitional pronation step. These region-specific CSNs terminate in different spinal levels and locations, therefore preferentially connecting with the premotor neurons of muscles engaged in different steps of the task. Together, our findings suggest that spatially defined groups of CSNs encode different movement modules, providing a logic for parallel-ordered corticospinal circuits to orchestrate multistep motor skills.
Brain-wide neural activity underlying memory-guided movement

Susu Chen,Yi Liu,Ziyue Aiden Wang,Jennifer Colonell,Liu D. Liu,Han Hou,Nai-Wen Tien,Tim Wang,Timothy Harris,Shaul Druckmann,Nuo Li,Karel Svoboda

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2023.12.035

IF: 64.5

2024-02-02

Cell

Abstract:A sparse neural network, distributed across major brain compartments, produces tightly orchestrated activity patterns underlying decision-making and movement initiation.

cell biology,biochemistry & molecular biology
A Motor Cortex Circuit for Motor Planning and Movement.

Nuo Li,Tsai-Wen Chen,Zengcai V. Guo,Charles R. Gerfen,Karel Svoboda

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14178

IF: 64.8

2015-01-01

Nature

Abstract:Activity in motor cortex predicts specific movements seconds before they occur, but how this preparatory activity relates to upcoming movements is obscure. We dissected the conversion of preparatory activity to movement within a structured motor cortex circuit. An anterior lateral region of the mouse cortex (a possible homologue of premotor cortex in primates) contains equal proportions of intermingled neurons predicting ipsi- or contralateral movements, yet unilateral inactivation of this cortical region during movement planning disrupts contralateral movements. Using cell-type-specific electrophysiology, cellular imaging and optogenetic perturbation, we show that layer 5 neurons projecting within the cortex have unbiased laterality. Activity with a contralateral population bias arises specifically in layer 5 neurons projecting to the brainstem, and only late during movement planning. These results reveal the transformation of distributed preparatory activity into movement commands within hierarchically organized cortical circuits.
Central mechanisms for force and motion--towards computational synthesis of human movement

Hooshang Hemami,Behzad Dariush

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2012.09.008

Abstract:Anatomical, physiological and experimental research on the human body can be supplemented by computational synthesis of the human body for all movement: routine daily activities, sports, dancing, and artistic and exploratory involvements. The synthesis requires thorough knowledge about all subsystems of the human body and their interactions, and allows for integration of known knowledge in working modules. It also affords confirmation and/or verification of scientific hypotheses about workings of the central nervous system (CNS). A simple step in this direction is explored here for controlling the forces of constraint. It requires co-activation of agonist-antagonist musculature. The desired trajectories of motion and the force of contact have to be provided by the CNS. The spinal control involves projection onto a muscular subset that induces the force of contact. The projection of force in the sensory motor cortex is implemented via a well-defined neural population unit, and is executed in the spinal cord by a standard integral controller requiring input from tendon organs. The sensory motor cortex structure is extended to the case for directing motion via two neural population units with vision input and spindle efferents. Digital computer simulations show the feasibility of the system. The formulation is modular and can be extended to multi-link limbs, robot and humanoid systems with many pairs of actuators or muscles. It can be expanded to include reticular activating structures and learning.
Cognitive control of movement via the cerebellar-recipient thalamus

Vincent Prevosto,Marc A. Sommer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2013.00056

2013-01-01

Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience

Abstract:The cognitive control of behavior was long considered to be centralized in cerebral cortex. More recently, subcortical structures such as cerebellum and basal ganglia have been implicated in cognitive functions as well. The fact that subcortico-cortical circuits for the control of movement involve the thalamus prompts the notion that activity in movement-related thalamus may also reflect elements of cognitive behavior. Yet this hypothesis has rarely been investigated. Using the pathways linking cerebellum to cerebral cortex via the thalamus as a template, we review evidence that the motor thalamus, together with movement-related central thalamus have the requisite connectivity and activity to mediate cognitive aspects of movement control.

neurosciences
Cerebellar control over inter-regional excitatory/inhibitory dynamics discriminates execution from observation of an action

Roberta Maria Lorenzi,Gokce Korkmaz,Adnan A.S. Alahmadi,Anita Monteverdi,Letizia Casiraghi,Egidio D'Angelo,Fulvia Palesi,Claudia A.M. Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.21.595114

2024-05-21

Abstract:The motor learning theory anticipates that cerebro-cerebellar loops perform sensorimotor prediction thereby regulating motor control. This operation has been identified during action execution (AE) and observation (AO) but the causal interaction between the cerebellum and cerebral cortex remained unclear. Here we used Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) to study functional MRI (fMRI) data obtained during a squeeze ball task in either the AE or AO conditions. In both cases, active regions included bilateral primary visual cortex (V1), left primary motor cortex (M1), left supplementary motor and premotor cortex (SMAPMC), left cingulate cortex (CC), left superior parietal lobule (SPL), and right cerebellum (CRBL). AE and AO networks showed the same fixed effective connectivity, with pathways between V1, CRBL, SMAPMC and CC wired in a closed loop. However, the cerebellar communication towards the cerebral cortex switched from excitatory in AE to inhibitory in AO. Moreover, in AE only, signal modulation was non-linear from SMAPMC to CRBL and within the CRBL self-connection, supporting the role of the CRBL in elaborating motor plans received from SMAPMC. Thus, the need for motor planning and the presence of a sensorimotor feedback in AE discriminate the modality of forward control operated by the CRBL on SMAPMC. While the underlying circuit mechanisms remain to be determined, these results reveal that the CRBL differentially controls the excitatory/inhibitory dynamics of inter-regional effective connectivity depending on its functional engagement, opening new prospective for the design of artificial sensorimotor controllers and for the investigation of neurological diseases.

Biology
Brain-wide dynamics linking sensation to action during decision-making

Andrei Khilkevich,Michael Lohse,Ryan Low,Ivana Orsolic,Tadej Bozic,Paige Windmill,Thomas D Mrsic-Flogel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07908-w

IF: 64.8

2024-09-11

Nature

Abstract:Perceptual decisions rely on learned associations between sensory evidence and appropriate actions, involving the filtering and integration of relevant inputs to prepare and execute timely responses1,2. Despite the distributed nature of task-relevant representations3-10, it remains unclear how transformations between sensory input, evidence integration, motor planning and execution are orchestrated across brain areas and dimensions of neural activity. Here we addressed this question by recording brain-wide neural activity in mice learning to report changes in ambiguous visual input. After learning, evidence integration emerged across most brain areas in sparse neural populations that drive movement-preparatory activity. Visual responses evolved from transient activations in sensory areas to sustained representations in frontal-motor cortex, thalamus, basal ganglia, midbrain and cerebellum, enabling parallel evidence accumulation. In areas that accumulate evidence, shared population activity patterns encode visual evidence and movement preparation, distinct from movement-execution dynamics. Activity in movement-preparatory subspace is driven by neurons integrating evidence, which collapses at movement onset, allowing the integration process to reset. Across premotor regions, evidence-integration timescales were independent of intrinsic regional dynamics, and thus depended on task experience. In summary, learning aligns evidence accumulation to action preparation in activity dynamics across dozens of brain regions. This leads to highly distributed and parallelized sensorimotor transformations during decision-making. Our work unifies concepts from decision-making and motor control fields into a brain-wide framework for understanding how sensory evidence controls actions.
Synaptic architecture of leg and wing premotor control networks in

Ellen Lesser,Anthony W. Azevedo,Jasper S. Phelps,Leila Elabbady,Andrew Cook,Durafshan Sakeena Syed,Brandon Mark,Sumiya Kuroda,Anne Sustar,Anthony Moussa,Chris J. Dallmann,Sweta Agrawal,Su-Yee J. Lee,Brandon Pratt,Kyobi Skutt-Kakaria,Stephan Gerhard,Ran Lu,Nico Kemnitz,Kisuk Lee,Akhilesh Halageri,Manuel Castro,Dodam Ih,Jay Gager,Marwan Tammam,Sven Dorkenwald,Forrest Collman,Casey Schneider-Mizell,Derrick Brittain,Chris S. Jordan,Thomas Macrina,Michael Dickinson,Wei-Chung Allen Lee,John C. Tuthill

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.30.542725

2024-04-28

Abstract:Animal movement is controlled by motor neurons (MNs), which project out of the central nervous system to activate muscles. MN activity is coordinated by complex premotor networks that allow individual muscles to contribute to many different behaviors. Here, we use connectomics to analyze the wiring logic of premotor circuits controlling the leg and wing. We find that both premotor networks cluster into modules that link MNs innervating muscles with related functions. Within most leg motor modules, the synaptic weights of each premotor neuron are proportional to the size of their target MNs, establishing a circuit basis for hierarchical MN recruitment. In contrast, wing premotor networks lack proportional synaptic connectivity, which may allow wing steering muscles to be recruited with different relative timing. By comparing the architecture of distinct limb motor control systems within the same animal, we identify common principles of premotor network organization and specializations that reflect the unique biomechanical constraints and evolutionary origins of leg and wing motor control.

Neuroscience
Synaptic wiring motifs in posterior parietal cortex support decision-making

Aaron T. Kuan,Giulio Bondanelli,Laura N. Driscoll,Julie Han,Minsu Kim,David G. C. Hildebrand,Brett J. Graham,Daniel E. Wilson,Logan A. Thomas,Stefano Panzeri,Christopher D. Harvey,Wei-Chung Allen Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07088-7

IF: 64.8

2024-02-22

Nature

Abstract:The posterior parietal cortex exhibits choice-selective activity during perceptual decision-making tasks 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 . However, it is not known how this selective activity arises from the underlying synaptic connectivity. Here we combined virtual-reality behaviour, two-photon calcium imaging, high-throughput electron microscopy and circuit modelling to analyse how synaptic connectivity between neurons in the posterior parietal cortex relates to their selective activity. We found that excitatory pyramidal neurons preferentially target inhibitory interneurons with the same selectivity. In turn, inhibitory interneurons preferentially target pyramidal neurons with opposite selectivity, forming an opponent inhibition motif. This motif was present even between neurons with activity peaks in different task epochs. We developed neural-circuit models of the computations performed by these motifs, and found that opponent inhibition between neural populations with opposite selectivity amplifies selective inputs, thereby improving the encoding of trial-type information. The models also predict that opponent inhibition between neurons with activity peaks in different task epochs contributes to creating choice-specific sequential activity. These results provide evidence for how synaptic connectivity in cortical circuits supports a learned decision-making task.

multidisciplinary sciences
Synaptic architecture of leg and wing premotor control networks in Drosophila

Ellen Lesser,Anthony W. Azevedo,Jasper S. Phelps,Leila Elabbady,Andrew Cook,Durafshan Sakeena Syed,Brandon Mark,Sumiya Kuroda,Anne Sustar,Anthony Moussa,Chris J. Dallmann,Sweta Agrawal,Su-Yee J. Lee,Brandon Pratt,Kyobi Skutt-Kakaria,Stephan Gerhard,Ran Lu,Nico Kemnitz,Kisuk Lee,Akhilesh Halageri,Manuel Castro,Dodam Ih,Jay Gager,Marwan Tammam,Sven Dorkenwald,Forrest Collman,Casey Schneider-Mizell,Derrick Brittain,Chris S. Jordan,Thomas Macrina,Michael Dickinson,Wei-Chung Allen Lee,John C. Tuthill

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07600-z

IF: 64.8

2024-06-27

Nature

Abstract:Animal movement is controlled by motor neurons (MNs), which project out of the central nervous system to activate muscles 1 . MN activity is coordinated by complex premotor networks that facilitate the contribution of individual muscles to many different behaviours 2,3,4,5,6 . Here we use connectomics 7 to analyse the wiring logic of premotor circuits controlling the Drosophila leg and wing. We find that both premotor networks cluster into modules that link MNs innervating muscles with related functions. Within most leg motor modules, the synaptic weights of each premotor neuron are proportional to the size of their target MNs, establishing a circuit basis for hierarchical MN recruitment. By contrast, wing premotor networks lack proportional synaptic connectivity, which may enable more flexible recruitment of wing steering muscles. Through comparison of the architecture of distinct motor control systems within the same animal, we identify common principles of premotor network organization and specializations that reflect the unique biomechanical constraints and evolutionary origins of leg and wing motor control.

multidisciplinary sciences
A switch in neuronal dynamics that helps to initiate movement

Oliver M. Gauld,Chunyu A. Duan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-01079-2

IF: 64.8

2022-04-28

Nature

Abstract:Nature, Published online: 28 April 2022; doi:10.1038/d41586-022-01079-2Experiments on the mouse brain reveal that neuronal signals from the midbrain to the cortex act as a switch that transforms the dynamics of cortical neuronal activity and, in turn, initiates movement.

multidisciplinary sciences
Brain Circuits for the Internal Monitoring of Movements

Marc A. Sommer,Robert H. Wurtz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125627

IF: 15.5539

2008-07-01

Annual Review of Neuroscience

Abstract:Each movement we make activates our own sensory receptors, thus causing a problem for the brain: the spurious, movement-related sensations must be discriminated from the sensory inputs that really matter, those representing our environment. Here we consider circuits for solving this problem in the primate brain. Such circuits convey a copy of each motor command, known as a corollary discharge (CD), to brain regions that use sensory input. In the visual system, CD signals may help to produce a stable visual percept from the jumpy images resulting from our rapid eye movements. A candidate pathway for providing CD for vision ascends from the superior colliculus to the frontal cortex in the primate brain. This circuit conveys warning signals about impending eye movements that are used for planning subsequent movements and analyzing the visual world. Identifying this circuit has provided a model for studying CD in other primate sensory systems and may lead to a better understanding of motor and mental disorders.

neurosciences
Anatomy and Neural Pathways Modulating Distinct Locomotor Behaviors in Drosophila Larva

Swetha B M Gowda,Safa Salim,Farhan Mohammad,Swetha B. M. Gowda

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10020090

2021-01-25

Biology

Abstract:The control of movements is a fundamental feature shared by all animals. At the most basic level, simple movements are generated by coordinated neural activity and muscle contraction patterns that are controlled by the central nervous system. How behavioral responses to various sensory inputs are processed and integrated by the downstream neural network to produce flexible and adaptive behaviors remains an intense area of investigation in many laboratories. Due to recent advances in experimental techniques, many fundamental neural pathways underlying animal movements have now been elucidated. For example, while the role of motor neurons in locomotion has been studied in great detail, the roles of interneurons in animal movements in both basic and noxious environments have only recently been realized. However, the genetic and transmitter identities of many of these interneurons remains unclear. In this review, we provide an overview of the underlying circuitry and neural pathways required by Drosophila larvae to produce successful movements. By improving our understanding of locomotor circuitry in model systems such as Drosophila, we will have a better understanding of how neural circuits in organisms with different bodies and brains lead to distinct locomotion types at the organism level. The understanding of genetic and physiological components of these movements types also provides directions to understand movements in higher organisms.

biology
Deconstructing the modular organization and real-time dynamics of mammalian spinal locomotor networks

Li-Ju Hsu,Maëlle Bertho,Ole Kiehn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36587-w

IF: 16.6

2023-02-16

Nature Communications

Abstract:Abstract Locomotion empowers animals to move. Locomotor-initiating signals from the brain are funneled through descending neurons in the brainstem that act directly on spinal locomotor circuits. Little is known in mammals about which spinal circuits are targeted by the command and how this command is transformed into rhythmicity in the cord. Here we address these questions leveraging a mouse brainstem-spinal cord preparation from either sex that allows locating the locomotor command neurons with simultaneous Ca 2+ imaging of spinal neurons. We show that a restricted brainstem area – encompassing the lateral paragigantocellular nucleus (LPGi) and caudal ventrolateral reticular nucleus (CVL) – contains glutamatergic neurons which directly initiate locomotion. Ca 2+ imaging captures the direct LPGi/CVL locomotor initiating command in the spinal cord and visualizes spinal glutamatergic modules that execute the descending command and its transformation into rhythmic locomotor activity. Inhibitory spinal networks are recruited in a distinctly different pattern. Our study uncovers the principal logic of how spinal circuits implement the locomotor command using a distinct modular organization.

multidisciplinary sciences
Computational Architecture of the Parieto-Frontal Network Underlying Cognitive-Motor Control in Monkeys

Roberto Caminiti,Elena Borra,Federica Visco-Comandini,Alexandra Battaglia-Mayer,Bruno B. Averbeck,Giuseppe Luppino

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/eneuro.0306-16.2017

2017-01-01

eNeuro

Abstract:The statistical structure of intrinsic parietal and parieto-frontal connectivity in monkeys was studied through hierarchical cluster analysis. Based on their inputs, parietal and frontal areas were grouped into different clusters, including a variable number of areas that in most instances occupied contiguous architectonic fields. Connectivity tended to be stronger locally: that is, within areas of the same cluster. Distant frontal and parietal areas were targeted through connections that in most instances were reciprocal and often of different strength. These connections linked parietal and frontal clusters formed by areas sharing basic functional properties. This led to five different medio-laterally oriented pillar domains spanning the entire extent of the parieto-frontal system, in the posterior parietal, anterior parietal, cingulate, frontal, and prefrontal cortex. Different information processing streams could be identified thanks to inter-domain connectivity. These streams encode fast hand reaching and its control, complex visuomotor action spaces, hand grasping, action/intention recognition, oculomotor intention and visual attention, behavioral goals and strategies, and reward and decision value outcome. Most of these streams converge on the cingulate domain, the main hub of the system. All of them are embedded within a larger eye-hand coordination network, from which they can be selectively set in motion by task demands.

neurosciences
Speed and segmentation control mechanisms characterized in rhythmically-active circuits created from spinal neurons produced from genetically-tagged embryonic stem cells

Matthew J Sternfeld,Christopher A Hinckley,Niall J Moore,Matthew T Pankratz,Kathryn L Hilde,Shawn P Driscoll,Marito Hayashi,Neal D Amin,Dario Bonanomi,Wesley D Gifford,Kamal Sharma,Martyn Goulding,Samuel L Pfaff

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.21540

IF: 7.7

2017-02-14

eLife

Abstract:Flexible neural networks, such as the interconnected spinal neurons that control distinct motor actions, can switch their activity to produce different behaviors. Both excitatory (E) and inhibitory (I) spinal neurons are necessary for motor behavior, but the influence of recruiting different ratios of E-to-I cells remains unclear. We constructed synthetic microphysical neural networks, called circuitoids, using precise combinations of spinal neuron subtypes derived from mouse stem cells. Circuitoids of purified excitatory interneurons were sufficient to generate oscillatory bursts with properties similar to in vivo central pattern generators. Inhibitory V1 neurons provided dual layers of regulation within excitatory rhythmogenic networks - they increased the rhythmic burst frequency of excitatory V3 neurons, and segmented excitatory motor neuron activity into sub-networks. Accordingly, the speed and pattern of spinal circuits that underlie complex motor behaviors may be regulated by quantitatively gating the intra-network cellular activity ratio of E-to-I neurons.

biology

Connecting neuronal circuits for movement

The Hierarchical Circuit for Executive Control of Movement

Brainstem Circuits for Locomotion

Integrating across behaviors and timescales to understand the neural control of movement

A neural circuit state change underlying skilled movements

Deconstruction of Corticospinal Circuits for Goal-Directed Motor Skills

Brain-wide neural activity underlying memory-guided movement

A Motor Cortex Circuit for Motor Planning and Movement.

Central mechanisms for force and motion--towards computational synthesis of human movement

Cognitive control of movement via the cerebellar-recipient thalamus

Cerebellar control over inter-regional excitatory/inhibitory dynamics discriminates execution from observation of an action

Brain-wide dynamics linking sensation to action during decision-making

Synaptic architecture of leg and wing premotor control networks in

Synaptic wiring motifs in posterior parietal cortex support decision-making

Synaptic architecture of leg and wing premotor control networks in Drosophila

A switch in neuronal dynamics that helps to initiate movement

Brain Circuits for the Internal Monitoring of Movements

Anatomy and Neural Pathways Modulating Distinct Locomotor Behaviors in Drosophila Larva

Deconstructing the modular organization and real-time dynamics of mammalian spinal locomotor networks

Computational Architecture of the Parieto-Frontal Network Underlying Cognitive-Motor Control in Monkeys

Speed and segmentation control mechanisms characterized in rhythmically-active circuits created from spinal neurons produced from genetically-tagged embryonic stem cells