Massive aspiration syndrome: a possible indication for "emergent" veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation?: a case report
Emiliano Gamberini,Venerino Poletti,Emanuele Russo,Alessandro Circelli,Marco Benni,Giovanni Scognamiglio,Domenico Pietro Santonastaso,Costanza Martino,Linda Domenichini,Romina Biondi,Giorgia Bastoni,Etrusca Brogi,Luca Ansaloni,Federico Coccolini,Paola Fugazzola,Martina Spiga,Vanni Agnoletti
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-021-03050-7
2021-10-08
Abstract:Background: Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is usually performed in cases of severe respiratory failure in which conventional and advanced mechanical ventilation strategies are ineffective in achieving true lung-protective ventilation, thus triggering ventilatory-induced lung injury. If circulatory failure coexists, veno-arterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) may be preferred over VV-ECMO because of its potential for circulatory support. In VA-ECMO, the respiratory contribution is less effective and the complication rate is higher than in the VV configuration. Case presentation: The authors present a case in which VV-ECMO was performed in an emergency setting to treat a 68-year-old White male patient who experienced acute respiratory failure after massive aspiration. Despite intubation and intensive care unit admission, multiple organ failure occurred suddenly, thus prompting referral to a level-1 trauma center with an ECMO facility. The patient's condition slowly improved with VV-ECMO support along with standard treatment for hemodynamic impairment. VV-ECMO was discontinued on day 8. The patient was extubated on day 14 and discharged home fully recovered 34 days after the event. Conclusions: Attention was focused on the decision to initiate VV-ECMO support even in the presence of severe hemodynamic derangement, although VA-ECMO could have provided better hemodynamic support but less effective respiratory support.