Abstract:The escalating costs of health care and other recent trends have made health care decisions of great societal import, with decision-making responsibility often being transferred from practitioners to health economists, health plans, and insurers. Health care decision making increasingly is guided by evidence that a treatment is efficacious, effective-disseminable, cost-effective, and scientifically plausible. Under these conditions of heightened cost concerns and institutional-economic decision making, psychologists are losing the opportunity to play a leadership role in mental and behavioral health care: Other types of practitioners are providing an increasing proportion of delivered treatment, and the use of psychiatric medication has increased dramatically relative to the provision of psychological interventions. Research has shown that numerous psychological interventions are efficacious, effective, and cost-effective. However, these interventions are used infrequently with patients who would benefit from them, in part because clinical psychologists have not made a convincing case for the use of these interventions (e.g., by supplying the data that decision makers need to support implementation of such interventions) and because clinical psychologists do not themselves use these interventions even when given the opportunity to do so. Clinical psychologists' failure to achieve a more significant impact on clinical and public health may be traced to their deep ambivalence about the role of science and their lack of adequate science training, which leads them to value personal clinical experience over research evidence, use assessment practices that have dubious psychometric support, and not use the interventions for which there is the strongest evidence of efficacy. Clinical psychology resembles medicine at a point in its history when practitioners were operating in a largely prescientific manner. Prior to the scientific reform of medicine in the early 1900s, physicians typically shared the attitudes of many of today's clinical psychologists, such as valuing personal experience over scientific research. Medicine was reformed, in large part, by a principled effort by the American Medical Association to increase the science base of medical school education. Substantial evidence shows that many clinical psychology doctoral training programs, especially PsyD and for-profit programs, do not uphold high standards for graduate admission, have high student-faculty ratios, deemphasize science in their training, and produce students who fail to apply or generate scientific knowledge. A promising strategy for improving the quality and clinical and public health impact of clinical psychology is through a new accreditation system that demands high-quality science training as a central feature of doctoral training in clinical psychology. Just as strengthening training standards in medicine markedly enhanced the quality of health care, improved training standards in clinical psychology will enhance health and mental health care. Such a system will (a) allow the public and employers to identify scientifically trained psychologists; (b) stigmatize ascientific training programs and practitioners; (c) produce aspirational effects, thereby enhancing training quality generally; and (d) help accredited programs improve their training in the application and generation of science. These effects should enhance the generation, application, and dissemination of experimentally supported interventions, thereby improving clinical and public health. Experimentally based treatments not only are highly effective but also are cost-effective relative to other interventions; therefore, they could help control spiraling health care costs. The new Psychological Clinical Science Accreditation System (PCSAS) is intended to accredit clinical psychology training programs that offer high-quality science-centered education and training, producing graduates who are successful in generating and applying scientific knowledge. Psychologists, universities, and other stakeholders should vigorously support this new accreditation system as the surest route to a scientifically principled clinical psychology that can powerfully benefit clinical and public health.

Development of a clinical child psychology training program.

Training, skills, and leadership experience: The need to expand clinical psychology training as illustrated by psychology leadership stories.

Current training practices and training gaps in clinical child and adolescent psychology: Implications for training guidelines.

Training Future School and Clinical Psychology Leaders in Consultation for Early Childhood Education Settings

Existing policies and procedures for training needs among clinical psychology trainees: An institutional policy review.

Current Status and Future Prospects of Clinical Psychology: Toward a Scientifically Principled Approach to Mental and Behavioral Health Care

[Training program for clinical psychologists in general hospital settings]

An international perspective on training in child and adolescent psychiatry

Ethical issues in education and training.

A qualitative investigation into perceptions of scientist-practitioner competence within supervision during psychology training programmes

Integrating Intersectionality, Social Determinants of Health, and Healing: A New Training Framework for School-Based Mental Health

Clinical psychology graduate programs: Falling short in cultural humility training.

Exploring trainee perspectives on barriers and facilitators in serious mental illness doctoral training.

The development and current directions of a diversity specialty clinic: Implications for multicultural training in psychology.

Utilizing a university and state collaboration to advance student training and support public mental health care.

Competence-Based Trainings for Psychological Treatments - A Transtheoretical Perspective

Evaluation of a multi-site health services psychology training program for telehealth and integrated behavioral health

A survey of the perceptions and practices of faculty in clinical neuropsychology doctoral training programs: is heterogeneity the norm?

Is training effective? A study of counseling psychology doctoral trainees in a psychodynamic/interpersonal training clinic.

Intentional leveraging of psychologist competencies: A case for expanding administrative leadership training opportunities in the Veterans Health Administration.

Survey to child/adolescent psychiatry and developmental/behavioral pediatric training directors to expand psychiatric‐mental health training to nurse practitioners