Surgical decision making in premenopausal BRCA carriers considering risk-reducing early salpingectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy: a qualitative study
Faiza Gaba,Shivam Goyal,Dalya Marks,Dhivya Chandrasekaran,Olivia Evans,Sadiyah Robbani,Charlotte Tyson,Rosa Legood,Ertan Saridogan,W Glenn McCluggage,Helen Hanson,Naveena Singh,D Gareth Evans,Usha Menon,Ranjit Manchanda,PROTECTOR team,Raji Ganesan,Gareth Bryson,Gareth Rowlands,Rupali Arora,Munaza Ahmed,Aarti Sharma,Gautam Mehra,Adam Rosenthal,Michelle Mackintosh,Sadaf Ghaem-Maghami,Omer Devaja,Sudha Sundar,Janos Balega,Tim Duncan,Claire Newton,Sonali Kaushik,Angela Brady,Supratik Chattopadhyay,Natalia Povolotskaya,Iain Cameron,Rema Iyer,Lucy Side,Katie Snape,Anil Tailor,Kavitha Thumuluru Madhuri,Katherine Edey,Sian Taylor,Manon van Seters,Suma Kodiathodi,Partha Sengupta,Scott Fegan,Karin Williamson,Andrew Phillips,Mark Willett,Tony Chalhoub,Sanjay Rao,Nicholas Matthews,Beena Abdul,Claire Park,Jane Borley,Ibraheem Hamoodi,Richard Hutson,Kerryn Lutchman-Singh,Richard Peevor,Mahalakshmi Gurumurthy,Kalpana Ragupathy,Emma Crosbie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107501
Abstract:Background: Acceptance of the role of the fallopian tube in 'ovarian' carcinogenesis and the detrimental sequelae of surgical menopause in premenopausal women following risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) has resulted in risk-reducing early-salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy (RRESDO) being proposed as an attractive alternative risk-reducing strategy in women who decline/delay oophorectomy. We present the results of a qualitative study evaluating the decision-making process among BRCA carriers considering prophylactic surgeries (RRSO/RRESDO) as part of the multicentre PROTECTOR trial (ISRCTN:25173360). Methods: In-depth semistructured 1:1 interviews conducted using a predeveloped topic-guide (development informed by literature review and expert consultation) until informational saturation reached. Wording and sequencing of questions were left open with probes used to elicit additional information. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, transcripts analysed using an inductive theoretical framework and data managed using NVIVO-v12. Results: Informational saturation was reached following 24 interviews. Seven interconnected themes integral to surgical decision making were identified: fertility/menopause/cancer risk reduction/surgical choices/surgical complications/sequence of ovarian-and-breast prophylactic surgeries/support/satisfaction. Women for whom maximising ovarian cancer risk reduction was relatively more important than early menopause/quality-of-life preferred RRSO, whereas those more concerned about detrimental impact of menopause chose RRESDO. Women managed in specialist familial cancer clinic settings compared with non-specialist settings felt they received better quality care, improved hormone replacement therapy access and were more satisfied. Conclusion: Multiple contextual factors (medical, physical, psychological, social) influence timing of risk-reducing surgeries. RRESDO offers women delaying/declining premenopausal oophorectomy, particularly those concerned about menopausal effects, a degree of ovarian cancer risk reduction while avoiding early menopause. Care of high-risk women should be centralised to centres with specialist familial gynaecological cancer risk management services to provide a better-quality, streamlined, holistic multidisciplinary approach.