Retrospective study of laboratory-based surveillance of rabies in wild and domestic animals in the southern United States, 2010–2021

Marcia R S Ilha,Katie A Dawson,Emily L Atkinson,Erin A Graham,Moges W Woldemeskel,Yung-Yi C Mosley,Michele D Coarsey,Hemant K Naikare,Marcia R. S. Ilha,Katie A. Dawson,Emily L. Atkinson,Erin A. Graham,Moges W. Woldemeskel,Yung-Yi C. Mosley,Michele D. Coarsey,Hemant K. Naikare
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10406387241247283
2024-05-17
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation
Abstract:Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, Ahead of Print. We performed a retrospective study of all case submissions for the rabies virus (RABV) direct fluorescent antibody test (DFAT) requested of the Tifton Veterinary Diagnostic and Investigational Laboratory (Tifton, GA, USA) between July 2010 and June 2021. Submitted were 792 samples from 23 animal species from 89 counties in Georgia, and 4 neighboring counties in Florida, 1 in South Carolina, and 1 in Alabama. In 13 (1.6%) cases, the DFAT result was inconclusive; 779 (98.4%) cases had a conclusive (positive or negative) test result. Of these 779 cases, 79 (10.1%) tested positive across 10 species. The remaining 700 (89.9%) cases were negative. The main reason for submission for RABV testing was human exposure to a potentially rabid animal in 414 (52.3%) cases. Among the 79 positive cases, 74 (93.7%) involved wildlife; raccoons (51 cases; 68.9%) were the primary host confirmed with RABV infection, followed by skunk and fox (8 cases each; 10.8%), bobcat (5 cases; 6.8%), and bats (2 cases; 2.7%). Only 5 domestic animals (6.3% of the positive cases) tested positive during our study period; one from each of the bovine, canine, caprine, equine, and feline species. Hence, the sylvatic cycle plays the predominant role in circulating RABV infection in our study area.
veterinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?