Influence of vitreous cortex remnants on normal retinal anatomy in eyes with primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Roberto dell'Omo,Pasquale Cucciniello,Marzia Affatato,Giuseppe Rapino,Andrea D'Albenzio,Federico Venturi,Giuseppe Campagna,Roberto dell’Omo,Andrea D’Albenzio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2024.04.015
2024-04-01
Ophthalmology Retina
Abstract:PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of vitreous cortex remnants (VCRs) removal on normal retinal anatomy in eyes with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.SUBJECTS: Patients with primary RRD operated with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV).METHODS: Blue fundus autofluorescence and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography were obtained pre-operatively, and at 1 and 6 months after operation.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes: rate of retinal displacement and outer retinal folds at 1 month after operation.SECONDARY OUTCOMES: continuity of the external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ), and the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity (logMAR BCVA) at 6 months after operation.RESULTS: One hundred three eyes were included. Intra-operatively, peripheral (p)VCRs were found in 42 eyes (40.8%) and successfully peeled off from ≥ 2 quadrants in 37 eyes. Macular (m)VCRs were detected in 37 (35.9%) and successfully peeled off in 29 eyes. At the end of operation 44.7% and 55.3% of the eyes were tamponaded with 20% sulfur hexafluoride gas and silicone oil 1000 centistokes, respectively. The only variable significantly associated with displacement was the use of gas tamponade vs. silicone oil (p=0.001) whereas no significant association was found between retinal displacement and pVCRs (p=0.58) or number of quadrants from which pVCRs were peeled off (p=0.39). At 1 month post-operatively ORFs were globally detected in 24 eyes (23.3%). Regression analysis showed a direct correlation between ORFs and the intraoperative detection of mVCRs (p=0.02) and an indirect correlation between ORFs and mVCRs peeling (p= 0.004). Macular VCRs peeling did not influence the continuity of ELM and EZ at the 6- month follow-up (FU). Intraoperative absence of mVCRs (p=0.0016) and peeling of mVCRs (p=0.003) were associated with logMAR BCVA ≤ 0.3 at the 6-month FU.CONCLUSIONS: Peeling of pVCRs did not seem to influence the rate of retinal displacement while peeling of mVCRs was associated with a reduced risk of developing ORFs without detrimental effect on the continuity of ELM/EZ at 6 month FU. The patients without mVCRs detected intraoperatively or who underwent mVCRs peeling during operation, showed a significantly better VA at the 6-month FU.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?