In the Unrest of Implication: Museum Education Methods in Atmospheres of Scandalization
Andrea Hubin,Karin Schneider,Andrea HubinKarin SchneiderAndrea Hubin is an art historian and art educator,currently based at the Kunsthalle Wien,where she developed and directed,among other things,the participatory project Community College in 2013–2020. Other contexts of her work as an art educator included Berlin Biennale 5,Volkskundemuseum Wien,and Generali Foundation Wien. 2007 she was part of the arts education project at the documenta 12 and was co-contributor of the knowledge transfer project DEUTSCH WISSEN in this context. Subsequently,she did research and published on educative concepts of the first documenta (1955).Karin Schneider is a contemporary historian and art educator. She is head of art education at the Museums of the City of Linz,Lentos Art Museum and Nordico City Museum. From 2007 to 2019,she was involved in several projects to develop and research art-based methods of history education including MemScreen and Conserved Memories at the Academy of Fine Arts Vienna and TRACES – transmitting contentious cultural heritages with the arts at the Institute for Art Education at the Zurich University of the Arts. 2001–2007 she was the staff member for art education at the mumok,Vienna. She was co-coordinator of the EU project MemAct!,which deals with new methods of Holocaust education.Together Karin Schneider and Andrea Hubin research,publish,and teach on the history,theory,and methods of art education. Working contexts include the project Intertwining Hi/Stories of Arts Education of the international network Another Roadmap for Arts Education and the University of Applied Arts Vienna. They develop new methodological approaches for art education (e.g. Learning from Vulnerability,Denkbilder,Talking with objects) and implement them in discursive projects with an experimental-performative character.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10598650.2023.2243788
2023-09-22
Journal of Museum Education
Abstract:In this essay, we explore ways in which cultural and museum spaces can be opened up to meaningful discussions about difficult topics and how this can be done through specific educational formats. We attempt to look critically at some of the assumptions that are around in critical museum education theory and practices, e.g. influences coming from standpoint theory. The goal is to understand our own unconscious biases as we develop methods to help address problematic issues such as racism and anti-Semitism. We argue that these biases are shaped by a logic of dichotomy that allows to position oneself on "the good side." Especially in an atmosphere of scandalization, these dichotomies might hinder mutual learning situations. We propose using Michael Rothberg's concept of the "implicated subject" to develop approaches and methods that move beyond dichotomous thinking patterns. We will try to illustrate our reflection process with three examples that also show that taking (one's own) implication seriously has unsettling effects that can stall the development of methods that seek to open spaces also for conflictual discussions.