Exploring perceptions of pilot licensing and training standards: a survey of Canadian student and licensed pilots
Syed A. Q. Rizvi Bradley Moncion Shi Cao a Department of Systems Design Engineering,University of Waterloo,Waterloo,ON,Canadab Waterloo Institute for Sustainable Aeronautics,University of Waterloo,Waterloo,ON,Canada
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2024.2395409
IF: 2.5612
2024-08-28
Ergonomics
Abstract:This study investigates the perspectives of Canadian student and licenced pilots on general aviation pilot training and licencing practices. Employing a mixed-methods approach, this research critiques the reliance on flight hours as the sole competence metric and examines the alignment of existing practices with modern aviation's complexities. Findings reveal a divergence in opinions between novice and experienced pilots on flight hours' importance, with a consensus towards a competency-based evaluation model. The study identifies critical shortcomings in existing training practices, such as the challenge of integrating technology, fostering advanced skills, and efficiently utilising instructional resources. It suggests recommendations for regulatory enhancements, aiming to ensure training practices evolve in line with the changing requirements of aviation safety and technology. The conclusion calls for urgent reform, underlining the imperative for training adaptations that can prepare pilots to proficiently manage the complexities of contemporary airspace, thus safeguarding their proficiency and safety. A survey conducted among Canadian student and licenced pilots to examine perspectives on general aviation pilot training and licencing practices uncovered critical shortcomings. The findings advocate for a strong preference for competency-based evaluations, urging reforms and regulatory improvements to ensure alignment with the evolving landscape of aviation safety and technological advancements.
engineering, industrial,ergonomics,psychology, applied