Abstract:In 2013 the Warsaw International Mechanism (WIM) for loss and damage (L&D) associated with climate change impacts was established under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). For scientists, L&D raises questions around the extent that such impacts can be attributed to anthropogenic climate change, which may generate complex results and be controversial in the policy arena. This is particularly true in the case of probabilistic event attribution (PEA) science, a new and rapidly evolving field that assesses whether changes in the probabilities of extreme events are attributable to GHG emissions. If the potential applications of PEA are to be considered responsibly, dialogue between scientists and policy makers is fundamental. Two key questions are considered here through a literature review and key stakeholder interviews with representatives from the science and policy sectors underpinning L&D. These provided the opportunity for in-depth insights into stakeholders’ views on firstly, how much is known and understood about PEA by those associated with the L&D debate? Secondly, how might PEA inform L&D and wider climate policy? Results show debate within the climate science community, and limited understanding among other stakeholders, around the sense in which extreme events can be attributed to climate change. However, stakeholders do identify and discuss potential uses for PEA in the WIM and wider policy, but it remains difficult to explore precise applications given the ambiguity surrounding L&D. This implies a need for stakeholders to develop greater understandings of alternative conceptions of L&D and the role of science, and also identify how PEA can best be used to support policy, and address associated challenges. Policy relevance The WIM was established to address the negative impacts of climate change, but whether attribution evidence will be required to link impacts to climate change is yet to be determined, and also controversial. Stakeholders show little awareness of PEA and agreement on its role, which raises important questions for policy. Dialogue between policymakers, practitioners and scientists could help to build a broader understanding of PEA, to determine whether it is relevant, and facilitate both its development and WIM high level decision-making processes.

Navigating expert judgment uncertainty in post-event environmental impact assessments for human-made disasters litigation

On the Coverage Scope of Major Risks in Preventive Environmental Public Interest Litigation

The Public Life of Private Law: Tort Law as a Risk Regulation Mechanism

A new approach for environmental damage assessment pursuant to the European Union Environmental Liability Directive

A Real-Time, Dynamic Early-Warning Model Based on Uncertainty Analysis and Risk Assessment for Sudden Water Pollution Accidents

Addressing uncertainty in Participatory Integrated Assessment: qualitative modeling approach for risk estimation

Gaining a deeper understanding of the psychology underpinning significance judgements in environmental impact assessment (EIA)

Stakeholder perceptions of event attribution in the loss and damage debate

Analyzing the effectiveness of environmental impact assessment in Paraná, Brazil and California, United States with fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis and the analytical hierarchy process

Enhancing post-hurricane regional loss assessment with crowdsourcing: A probabilistic inference approach

A decision support system for liability in civil litigation: a case study from an insurance company

Ecocide Before the International Criminal Court: Simplicity is Better Than an Elaborate Embellishment

Pollution Crime Scenario Reconstruction for Effective Environmental Redress

Exploring the quality of evidence for complex and contested policy decisions

Environmental judicial reform and corporate investment behavior - Based on a quasi-natural experiment of environmental courts

Evidential reasoning rule for environmental governance cost prediction with considering causal relationship and data reliability

Environmental legal institutions and management earnings forecasts: Evidence from the establishment of environmental courts in China

Judicial Application of Punitive Damages for Ecological Environment Infringement in Civil Public Interest Litigation

The social utility of event attribution: liability, adaptation, and justice-based loss and damage

Expert judgment-based reliability analysis of the Dutch flood defense system

Environmental Impact Assessment Law in China's courts: A study of 107 judicial decisions