The value of vestibular graviceptive pathway evaluation in the diagnosis of unilateral peripheral vestibular dysfunction
Tong‐tong Zhao,Meng‐lu Zhang,Yu‐fei Feng,Qian‐qian Wang,Ning Song,Xu Yang,Xiao‐hong Ba
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3055
IF: 3.1
2023-05-17
Brain and Behavior
Abstract:(1) Alterations in SVV, SVH, OT, and SD were noted in patients with UPVD in acute attack and remission phases, which are presumed to be related to dynamic vestibular compensation. (2) There were significant correlations between VGP evaluation results and semicircular canal function test, audiological test results, indicating that VGP evaluation may be helpful for localization diagnosis of side involvement in patients with UPVD. ( 3) The presence of c‐VGP in UPVD patients may be mostly related to bilateral labyrinth lesions or endolymphatic hydrops on the affected side, and the involvement of autoimmune mechanisms also deserves attention. Background Evaluation of vestibular graviceptive pathway (VGP) in patients with unilateral peripheral vestibular dysfunction (UPVD) has received increasing attention from researchers. The study aimed to investigate the value of VGP evaluation in the diagnosis of UPVD. Methods Ninety‐five UPVD patients were divided into attack and remission phase groups. VGP evaluation‐related indicators, including subjective visual vertical (SVV), subjective visual horizontal (SVH), head tilt, ocular torsion (OT), and skew deviation (SD), were measured, and their correlations with cochleovestibular function test results were analyzed. The possible etiologies of contralesional VGP (c‐VGP) were analyzed. Results Positive rates of SVV, SVH, OT, and SD were significantly higher, and the degrees of SVV, SVH, and OT were significantly greater in the attack phase group than the remission phase group. The sides with abnormal VGP evaluation results were correlated with the sides with hearing loss, abnormal caloric, and video head impulse test (vHIT) results. A total of 14 patients showed c‐VGP, and possible etiologies included contralateral benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (n = 4), bilateral hearing loss (n = 8), bilateral vHIT gain reduction (n = 1), autoimmune diseases (n = 6), vascular risk factors (n = 6), lacunar infarction (n = 3), and endolymphatic hydrops (n = 3). Conclusions Alterations in SVV, SVH, OT, and SD were noted in UPVD patients in different phases, which are presumed to be related to dynamic vestibular compensation; correlations between VGP evaluation results and cochleovestibular function test results indicate that VGP evaluation may be helpful for the diagnosis of the side affected in UPVD; the presence of c‐VGP may be related to bilateral labyrinth lesions or endolymphatic hydrops on the affected side; and the involvement of autoimmune mechanisms also deserves attention.
behavioral sciences,neurosciences