Abstract:Empirical legal studies can benefit from the research findings of cultural psychology to understand the fundamental principles of law. Research findings in cultural psychology have shown that Eastern Asian cultures and North American cultures differ significantly in value orientations, moral judgments and cognitive styles. East Asian values emphasize collectivism and North American values emphasize individualism. East Asians moral reasons are centered on the principles of duties and responsibilities whereas North American moral reasons are centered on the principles of autonomy and justice. East Asian cognitive styles tend to be more holistic, focusing on context, backgrounds and relations and the North American cognitive styles tend to be more analytic, focusing on objects, categories and dispositions. Such cultural differences have profound implications in legal understanding and legal practices, as laws are human machinery and are subject to the influence of human values, moralities and cognition. Mounting evidence in cross-cultural legal studies has shown East and West differences in causation inquiry, responsibility judgments, contract formation and mediation practices. Research indicates that East Asian causal reasoning is less likely to make the fundamental attribution error as North Americans do. East Asians’ responsibility judgments, compared with North Americans’, involve more contextual information (such as moral judgments) than the law actually warrants. East Asians’ contract formation may be more based on relational obligations than the North Americans’, which are rule based. The compensation judgments by East Asians appear to be based on the consequence whereas judgments made by North Americans seem to be based on intention judgments. East Asians also prefer mediation in conflict resolutions while North Americans prefer litigation in conflict resolutions. We argue that these differences could influence people’s understanding, construction and use of laws in fundamental ways. As the law attempts to further understand people, and as theorists continue to evaluate how human life and law influence each others, scholars in both psychology and law must challenge themselves to reflect on the law’s substantive and procedural standards being applied in different cultural groups.. We hope our paper can generate enough interests among Chinese psychologists and legal scholars to start the journey towards finding solutions that both considers cultural psychology’s empirical findings and effectuates our legal ideals. The cross-culture empirical legal studies hence not only provide a new paradigm for legal scholarship but also provide theoretical guidance for advancing Chinese legal studies in global stages as well as in resolving international legal disputes between people from China and other countries.

Using Reflection to Engage with the Affective Domain in Legal Education in the Context of Cultural and Institutional Diversity

Transforming legal education through emotions

Cognitive Emotion and the Law

Using soft skills courses to inspire law teachers: a new methodology for a more humanistic legal education

Teaching and Assessing Reflective Writing in a Large Undergraduate Core Substantive Law Unit

Linguistic diversity as a challenge and an opportunity for improved legal policy

Exploring the affective dimension of teachers’ work in alternative school settings

Health sciences training for disability inclusion: the need to engage with emotion

The Role of Legal Education in Shaping the Legal Culture of the Future: Strategies and Prospects for Development

When is lack of emotion a problem for justice? Four views on legal decision makers’ emotive life

How to judge emotions? Measuring moral emotions of lawyers in a retrospective situation

Social justice jurisprudence of clinical education programme: A paradigm shift from legal education to justice education

The Power of Experiential Learning in Emotional Courtroom Spaces

Reexamining the integrative approach to legal ethics education: the case of Hong Kong as an Asian financial centre

Visible learning at law school: an Australian approach to improving teacher impact in intensive and online courses

Role of Legal Education in Advancement of Access to Justice: A Panormic Insight

What role can affect and emotion play in academic and research information literacy practices?

Challenge and Contribution of Cultural Psychology to Empirical Legal Studies

Towards high-quality reflective learning amongst law undergraduate students: analysing students’ reflective journals during a problem-based learning course

Educating on emotions for effective learning

Understanding Law and Emotion