American marten occupancy and activity patterns at the southern extent of their range in the eastern United States

Sarah Ashbrook,Paul Hapeman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10904
IF: 3.167
2024-02-06
Ecology and Evolution
Abstract:Models of occupancy using detection data from camera surveys for American marten in southern Vermont indicated that detectability decreased with increasing distance from historical reintroduction sites. Unit‐level occupancy models containing covariates did not perform better than the base model that assumes occupancy is homogeneous among units. Marten appears to be restricted by some attribute (e.g. vital demographic rate) that was not measured in the study. The relatively recent rediscovery of an American marten (Martes americana) population that was reintroduced over 30 years ago in southern Vermont provides an opportunity to investigate the relative importance of other mesocarnivores, and forest stand (e.g., DBH, downed logs, vertical structure) and habitat variables to their presence on the Green Mountain National Forest. Marten are state‐listed as an endangered species in Vermont and occur there at the southern extent of their range in the eastern United States. We collected detection data from camera surveys in 5 km2 units between 2019 and 2021 (December–April; n = 40 units, 238 cameras). We examined activity patterns and applied an occupancy modeling framework to the detection data to assess the relative importance of covariates at unit and camera levels and assess interactions of marten with other mesocarnivores. We did not find any unit‐level occupancy models with significant covariates that were better supported than the base model in the single‐season unit‐level analysis. Distance to the nearest release site was the covariate most supported for detectability at both spatial scales, and marten occupancy at the camera level was positively influenced by the amount of canopy cover. Two species interaction models did not indicate any positive or negative association beyond random with other mesocarnivores and activity patterns among mesocarnivores had substantial overlap. Marten recovery since the time of the reintroduction appears slow, and even 30 years later, the marten distribution is limited and suggests that dispersal is restricted at some level. We recommend a further investigation of the possible impact of other mesocarnivores to juvenile survival or other vital demographic rate (e.g., recruitment) in marten that were not explicitly measured in this study.
ecology,evolutionary biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?