Abstract:It has long been recognized that avian mass loss during breeding could be adaptive, though many studies still commonly interpret mass loss as evidence of "stress" or a cost of reproduction. Here, we used a long‐term dataset from a breeding population of European starlings to investigate the ecological and/or life‐history contexts under which mass loss may be viewed as a "cost" or an adaptive strategy and, specifically, test whether mass loss during chick rearing represents a phenotypically plastic trait that varies predictably in relation to ecological context and individual quality. Overall, we found no support for the idea that mass loss reflects "reproductive stress" in our system and instead suggest that mass loss may represent an individually plastic trait that individuals use to "level the playing field" and individually optimize reproductive effort and fitness. It has long been recognized that mass loss during breeding could be adaptive (e.g., by ameliorating the costs of increased parental activity). However, many studies still commonly interpret mass loss as evidence of "stress" or a cost of reproduction (i.e., a negative effect of high workload during chick provisioning). Despite several studies reporting evidence in support of both hypotheses, the ecological and/or life‐history contexts under which mass loss may be viewed as a "cost" or an adaptive strategy are still unclear. Here, we used a long‐term dataset from a breeding population of European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) to investigate natural annual and individual variation in body mass and mass loss and to test whether mass loss during chick rearing represents a phenotypically plastic trait that varies predictably in relation to ecological context and individual quality. While there was significant annual variation in incubation mass, chick‐rearing mass, and mass change, there were no systematic relationships between mass loss and current breeding success or future fecundity and survival. In addition, we found no evidence of intra‐annual repeatability of mass loss between first and second broods ( = .00) but moderate interannual repeatability of mass loss (R = .61) during first broods, suggesting differences in mass loss under different selective pressures. However, we found no covariation between residual intra‐individual variation in mass loss for first broods and other reproductive or life‐history traits. We therefore found no support for the idea that mass loss reflects "reproductive stress" in our system: there were no negative relationships between mass loss and either current or future reproduction and survival (local return rate). Our results are consistent with mass loss being an individually plastic trait, with individuals using mass loss to "level the playing field" and individually optimize reproductive effort and fitness within their specific ecological context and relative to their individual quality for a given breeding attempt.

Inbreeding depression depends on the body size and environmental conditions in a threatened songbird, the aquatic warbler Acrocephalus paludicola

Inbreeding depression depends on the body size and environmental conditions in a threatened songbird, the aquatic warbler

Offspring sex ratio variation in relation to brood size and mortality in a promiscuous species: the Aquatic Warbler Acrocephalus paludicola

MALE REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS IS CORRELATED WITH BLOOD PARASITE LEVELS AND BODY CONDITION IN THE PROMISCUOUS AQUATIC WARBLER (ACROCEPHALUS PALUDICOLA)

Low Genetic Diversity and High Gene Flow in the Aquatic Warbler (acrocephalus Paludicola), a Threatened Marshland Songbird with a Fragmented Breeding Range

Little evidence for inbreeding depression for birth mass, survival and growth in Antarctic fur seal pups

Little evidence of inbreeding depression for birth mass, survival and growth in Antarctic fur seal pups

Sex‐specific effects of inbreeding in juvenile brown trout

Developmental stage‐dependent effects of perceived predation risk on nestling tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor)

Phenotypic plasticity in mass loss during chick rearing in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris)

Inbreeding accelerates reproductive senescence, but not survival senescence, in a precocial bird

Trait‐specific sensitive developmental windows: Wing growth best integrates weather conditions encountered throughout the development of nestling Alpine swifts

ENSO, Nest Predation Risk, Food Abundance, and Male Status Fail to Explain Annual Variations in the Apparent Survival Rate of a Migratory Songbird

Declining health status of Brown Skua (Stercorarius antarcticus lonnbergi) parents and their offspring during chick development

Does inbreeding affect personality traits? An experimental study in a precocial bird

Heterozygosity-Fitness Correlations in a Continental Island Population of Thorn-Tailed Rayadito

Patterns of feather mite (Acariformes: Astigmata) prevalence and load in a promiscuous bird during the breeding season

Inequality among offspring, correlates of recruitment and lifetime reproductive success in a long-lived raptor

Brief increases in corticosterone affect morphology, stress responses, and telomere length, but not post-fledging movements, in a wild songbird

Winter-ground microhabitat use by differently coloured phenotypes affects return rate in a long-distance migratory bird

Between-year and spatial variation in body condition across the breeding cycle in a pelagic seabird, the Red-billed Tropicbird