F. Gieres
Abstract:Differents formalismes sont utilises en mecanique quantique pour la description des etats et des observables : la mecanique ondulatoire, la mecanique matricielle et le formalisme invariant. Nous discutons les problemes et inconvenients du formalisme invariant ainsi que ceux de la notation des bras et kets introduite par Dirac dans ce contexte. Nous indiquons comment tous les problemes peuvent etre resolus ou du moins evites. Une serie d'exemples illustre les points souleves et montre comment l'insouciance mathematique peut aisement conduire a des contradictions mathematiques surprenantes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to solve the mathematical problems and inconveniences brought by formalism and its symbolic representation in quantum mechanics. Specifically, the article mainly focuses on the following aspects:
1. **Comparison of different quantum - mechanical formalisms**: The article discusses three different methods of describing quantum mechanics - wave mechanics, matrix mechanics, and invariant formalism (or abstract Hilbert - space formalism). The author explores the advantages and disadvantages among these formalisms and specifically points out the problems of invariant formalism and Dirac notation in practical applications.
2. **Problems of invariant formalism**: Invariant formalism uses abstract Hilbert spaces to describe quantum states and observables. Although this method has certain theoretical advantages, it also introduces some mathematical complexity and ambiguity. For example, when dealing with some simple problems, it is necessary to introduce generalized functions that do not belong to Hilbert spaces (such as eigenstates of the position operator), and it is very sensitive to the choice of the domain of linear operators in infinite - dimensional spaces. In addition, how to correctly define "observables" is also a challenge, especially in the case of spaces with non - trivial topological structures or random potential fields.
3. **Limitations of Dirac notation**: Although the bra - ket notation introduced by Dirac is concise and intuitive, there are some ambiguities and potential contradictions in a strict mathematical sense. For example, when it comes to unbounded operators, the concept of the adjoint operator becomes difficult to define; and this notation may lead to confusion in symmetry and conjugate relations, thus affecting specific calculation results.
4. **Enlightenment in teaching and practice**: Based on the above analysis, the author suggests that in the teaching process, one can start with wave mechanics, emphasizing the geometric structure behind it, and then gradually introduce other representation methods. Doing so can not only avoid some unnecessary mathematical difficulties, but also better help students understand the basic concepts of quantum mechanics.
In summary, this paper aims to reveal the potential problems in different formalisms and their symbolic systems in quantum mechanics through detailed discussion, and propose improvement methods, in order to provide a clearer and more rigorous foundation for theoretical research and education.