Abstract:This study employs corpus-based ecological discourse analysis to explore representations of the ecological attitudes in English-language news reports on China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in China, India, and the United States from 2013 to 2022. It reveals the media's perception and attitude towards the BRI in these nations. The analysis reveals that media outlets in each country project different ecological stances using varied attitudinal resources. The Chinese media frequently deploy beneficial attitudinal resources to highlight the BRI's achievements and advocate for broader international engagement. In contrast, the Indian media exhibit a balanced usage of beneficial, neutral, and destructive attitudinal resources, reflecting a prudent and observant attitude towards the BRI. The American media corpus displays a greater prevalence of neutral and destructive attitudinal representations over beneficial ones, suggesting a comparatively skeptical reception of the initiative. The study argues that these divergent patterns of ecological attitudes and the selection of attitudinal resources are shaped by factors such as economic development, geographical context, and social values.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore the ways in which the media in China, India and the United States express their ecological attitudes towards the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) from 2013 to 2022. Specifically, through the corpus - based ecological discourse analysis method, the study reveals the different ecological stances of the media in the three countries towards the BRI and the different emotional resources they use. The study aims to understand how these different ecological attitude patterns are influenced by factors such as economic development, geographical background and social values, and to explore how these media representations affect the public's perception of China's international activities.
### Main problems
1. **How are the ecological attitudes of the Chinese, Indian and American media towards the BRI different?**
- The study found that Chinese media frequently use positive emotional resources to highlight the achievements of the BRI and advocate broader international participation.
- Indian media shows a balanced use of positive, neutral and negative emotional resources, reflecting a cautious and observant attitude towards the BRI.
- American media uses more neutral and negative emotional resources, indicating a relatively skeptical attitude towards the BRI.
2. **How are these different ecological attitude patterns formed?**
- The study points out that these different ecological attitude patterns are influenced by factors such as economic development, geographical background and social values.
3. **How does the media's coverage of the BRI affect the public's perception of China's international activities?**
- The study emphasizes that news reports play an important role in shaping readers' perception of the BRI and interpreting China's international activities.
### Method
- **Data collection**: The study is based on three self - built corpora, representing the reports of Chinese, Indian and American media on the BRI respectively. These corpora were constructed by searching for "belt and road" - related articles in the LexisNexis database, with the time range from September 1, 2013 to October 31, 2022.
- **Methodology**: A corpus - based discourse analysis method, combining quantitative and qualitative analysis, was adopted. First, the Wordsmith 8.0 tool was used to compare with the British National Corpus (BNC) to identify keywords related to the BRI. Then, through concordance analysis, the context of commonly used BRI - related terms was carefully examined, and finally, the expressions of ecological attitudes in these contexts were analyzed under the framework of the ecological attitude system.
### Results
- **Chinese media**: The proportion of positive attitude resources is the highest (82.50%), and there are fewer neutral and negative attitude resources.
- **Indian media**: The proportion of positive attitude resources is 40.67%, and the neutral and negative attitude resources are relatively balanced.
- **American media**: The proportion of neutral attitude resources is the highest (48.70%), followed by negative attitude resources (26.55%), and the least is positive attitude resources (24.74%).
### Conclusion
Through the analysis of the ecological attitude system, the study reveals the different cognitions and evaluations of the Chinese, Indian and American media towards the BRI. These differences not only reflect the attitudes of various countries towards the BRI, but also reveal how media reports affect the public's perception of this initiative. These findings are helpful for understanding the complex attitudes of different countries towards the BRI and the sociocultural factors behind them.