Galaxy Clustering at z ~ 2 and Halo Radii

Boudewijn F. Roukema,David Valls-Gabaud,Bahram Mobasher,Stanislaw Bajtlik
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02423.x
1999-01-22
Abstract:The amplitude of the angular two-point galaxy correlation function w(\theta) for galaxies at z~2 is estimated for galaxies in the Hubble Deep Field by using a U < 27 complete sub-sample. (i) It is confirmed that the amplitude of the correlation can be corrected for the integral constraint without having to make assumptions about the shape of the correlation function and by avoiding the introduction of linear error terms. The estimate using this technique is w(5'') = 0.10 \pm 0.09. (ii) If the biases introduced in faint galaxy selection due to obscuration by large objects are not corrected for by masking areas around them, then the estimate would be w(5'') =0.16\pm 0.07. (iii) The effective (3-D) galaxy pair separation at 5'' and this redshift range is ~ 25-250 /h kpc, so the correction to the spatial correlation function \xi(r) due to exclusion of overlapping galaxy dark matter haloes should be considered. For clustering stable in proper units in an \Omega=1,\lambda=0 universe, our w(5\arcs) estimate (a) implies a present-day correlation length of r_0 ~ 2.6^{+1.1}_{-1.7}/h Mpc if halo overlapping is ignored, but (b) for a present-day correlation length of r_0=5.5/h Mpc implies that a typical halo exclusion radius is r_halo=70^{+420}_{-30}/h kpc. (iv) The decreasing correlation period (DCP) of a high initial bias in the spatial correlation function is not detected at this redshift. For an \Omega=1,\lambda=0 universe and (proper) stable clustering, possible detections of the DCP in other work would imply that \xi at redshifts greater than z_t = 1.7\pm0.9 would be [(1+z)/(1+z_t)]^{2.1\pm3.6} times higher than at z_t, which is consistent with our lack of a detection at z ~ 2.
Astrophysics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?