The Evolutionary Biology of Ourselves: Unit Requirements and Organizational Change in United States History

Carl Lipo,Mark Madsen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.adap-org/9901001
1999-01-05
Abstract:Researchers have proposed that the distinction between so-called "simple" and "complex" societies can be expressed by an increase in the number of levels at which functional organization, interaction, and thus selection, operate. In spite of the obvious links between this suggestion and research into complex social organization amongst insects and other social animals, the levels of selection model has seen little use among anthropologists. We suggest that the primary reason for lack of research into the evolutionary causes of social complexity has been the lack of descriptive units with which we can examine phenotypic variation and heritability of social organization above the level of the organism. The goal of our paper, therefore, is to begin constructing descriptive units which map to meaningful models of multi-level selection. In order to demonstrate how these units are useful in a real dataset, we examine the functional changes involved in the United States economy over the last 100 years, a period of time characterized, we believe, by significant changes in the number and kinds of social aggregates functioning as "individuals" with respect to selection. Our preliminary analysis suggests that it is possible to measure changes in the scale at which functional integration occurs through published data, and that the multilevel selection model for complex society may possess considerable power for describing how selection of culturally transmitted variation occurs in complex societies.
Adaptation and Self-Organizing Systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: How to construct appropriate measurement units within the framework of evolutionary theory to explain the organizational changes in complex societies. Specifically, the authors focus on the phenomenon of the transformation from "simple" societies to "complex" societies during the process of cultural evolution and explore the mechanisms behind this transformation. They believe that when existing theories are applied to archaeology and other related fields, there is a lack of specific definitions of measurement units, which makes it difficult to combine theories with actual data. Therefore, their goal is to create a set of units that can be used to measure organizational changes in order to better understand the development of human social complexity. ### Main problems of the paper 1. **Disconnection between theory and empirical data**: - When existing theories describe cultural evolution, they often overlook specific measurement units, making it difficult to apply the theories to actual cases. - The authors point out that although Darwin's theory of evolution provides a powerful tool for explaining cultural change, its application is limited mainly because of the lack of clear measurement units. 2. **Definition of selection units**: - In evolutionary biology, the selection of units of selection (such as individuals, groups, etc.) is crucial. The authors emphasize the need to clearly distinguish between theoretical units and empirical units to ensure that the model can accurately reflect the real situation. - They propose three levels of units: interactor, attributes, and aggregate, and discuss the application of these units at different scales. 3. **Origin and development of complex societies**: - The authors pay special attention to the transformation from "simple" societies to "complex" societies and believe that this transformation involves changes in the scale of selection units. For example, in simple societies, selection mainly acts at the individual level; while in complex societies, selection may act on larger social units, such as groups or organizations. 4. **Organizational changes in American history**: - In order to verify their theoretical framework, the authors select a specific historical case - the socio - economic evolution of the United States from the mid - 19th century to the present. By analyzing the organizational changes during this period, they hope to show how to use the newly proposed measurement units to explain the evolution of complex societies. ### Summary The core problem of the paper is: How to apply evolutionary theory to explain the organizational changes in complex societies by constructing appropriate measurement units. The authors hope that through this method, they can more accurately understand the origin and development of human social complexity, especially in the process of the transformation from simple societies to complex societies.