Multiparameter immunoprofiling for the diagnosis and differentiation of progressive versus nonprogressive nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease–A pilot study

Paige K. Marty,Balaji Pathakumari,Thomas M. Cox,Virginia P. Van Keulen,Courtney L. Erskine,Maleeha Shah,Mounika Vadiyala,Pedro Arias-Sanchez,Snigdha Karnakoti,Kelly M. Pennington,Elitza S. Theel,Cecilia S. Lindestam Arlehamn,Tobias Peikert,Patricio Escalante
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301659
IF: 3.7
2024-04-20
PLoS ONE
Abstract:Clinical prediction of nontuberculous mycobacteria lung disease (NTM-LD) progression remains challenging. We aimed to evaluate antigen-specific immunoprofiling utilizing flow cytometry (FC) of activation-induced markers (AIM) and IFN-γ enzyme-linked immune absorbent spot assay (ELISpot) accurately identifies patients with NTM-LD, and differentiate those with progressive from nonprogressive NTM-LD. A Prospective, single-center, and laboratory technician-blinded pilot study was conducted to evaluate the FC and ELISpot based immunoprofiling in patients with NTM-LD (n = 18) and controls (n = 22). Among 18 NTM-LD patients, 10 NTM-LD patients were classified into nonprogressive, and 8 as progressive NTM-LD based on clinical and radiological features. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected from patients with NTM-LD and control subjects with negative QuantiFERON results. After stimulation with purified protein derivative (PPD), mycobacteria-specific peptide pools (MTB300, RD1-peptides), and control antigens, we performed IFN-γ ELISpot and FC AIM assays to access their diagnostic accuracies by receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis across study groups. Patients with NTM-LD had significantly higher percentage of CD4 + /CD8 + T-cells co-expressing CD25 + CD134 + in response to PPD stimulation, differentiating between NTM-LD and controls. Among patients with NTM-LD, there was a significant difference in CD25 + CD134 + co-expression in MTB300-stimulated CD8 + T-cells (p <0.05; AUC-ROC = 0.831; Sensitivity = 75% [95% CI: 34.9–96.8]; Specificity = 90% [95% CI: 55.5–99.7]) between progressors and nonprogressors. Significant differences in the ratios of antigen-specific IFN-γ ELISpot responses were also seen for RD1-nil/PPD-nil and RD1-nil/anti-CD3-nil between patients with nonprogressive vs. progressive NTM-LD. Our results suggest that multiparameter immunoprofiling can accurately identify patients with NTM-LD and may identify patients at risk of disease progression. A larger longitudinal study is needed to further evaluate this novel immunoprofiling approach.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?