Abstract:The five‐choice serial reaction time task (5CSRTT) is a test of attention that provides a well‐validated ancillary measure of impulsive action, measured as premature responses. The 5CSRTT has been adapted for the use in touchscreen operant boxes. We assessed long‐term stability of performance, including premature responding in this touchscreen task. Mice were trained on the baseline 5CSRTT, then tested using three versions of the task: reduced stimulus duration (SD), variable inter‐trial interval (ITI), and elongated 9 s ITI. We then tested the performance following administration of pharmacological agents known to affect attention and impulsive action—cocaine, atomoxetine, and yohimbine. Mice were lastly re‐tested 6 months later using the 5CSRTT with a 9 s ITI. A reduced SD impacted attention but had no effect on premature responding. Both the variable and 9 s ITI increased premature responses. Mice showed similar and stable levels of increased premature responding 6 months later. Cocaine increased premature responding. Atomoxetine reduced premature responding. Yohimbine had no effect on premature responding in the baseline task but decreased premature responding when tested using a 9 s ITI. Overall, these results highlight that the touch screen adaptation of the 5CSRTT is an effective method for longitudinal testing of attention and impulsive action and remains sensitive to performance changes arising from repeated pharmacological and behavioral challenges. The five‐choice serial reaction time task (5CSRTT) is a test of attention that provides a well‐validated ancillary measure of impulsive action, measured by premature responses. The task has been adapted for mice in touchscreen operant boxes, which is thought to offer improved test–retest reliability. Few studies have assessed the long‐term stability of performance, including premature responding in this version of the task. We used the touchscreen 5CSRTT to conduct longitudinal testing of stability of premature responding following repeated behavioral and pharmacological manipulations. Male C57BL/6J mice were trained on a baseline version of the 5CSRTT. They were then tested on versions of the task in which the stimulus duration was reduced, and inter‐trial intervals were elongated or varied within‐session. Premature responding was subsequently tested following administration of pharmacological agents known to bi‐directionally affect attention and impulsive action—cocaine, atomoxetine, and yohimbine. Mice were lastly re‐tested 6 months later using the 5CSRTT with elongated inter‐trial intervals. A reduced stimulus duration impacted attention, with reduced accuracy and increased omissions, but had no effect on premature responding. Both elongating and varying the inter‐trial interval within‐session increased premature responses. Mice showed similar and stable levels of increased premature responding 6 months later. Cocaine increased premature responding, though less than previously reported in rats. Atomoxetine reduced premature responding. Yohimbine had no effect on premature responding in the baseline task but decreased premature responding when tested using an elongated inter‐trial interval. Overall, these results highlight that the touch screen adaptation of the 5CSRTT is an effective method for longitudinal testing of attention and impulsive action and remains sensitive to performance changes arising from repeated pharmacological and behavioral challenges.

Development of a novel rodent rapid serial visual presentation task reveals dissociable effects of stimulant versus nonstimulant treatments on attentional processes

Profiling attention and cognition enhancing drugs in a rat touchscreen-based continuous performance test

Theory of visual attention (TVA) applied to rats performing the 5-choice serial reaction time task: differential effects of dopaminergic and noradrenergic manipulations

Adaptive Aspects of Impulsivity and Interactions with Effects of Catecholaminergic Agents in the 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: Implications for ADHD

Time-on-task-related decrements in performance in the rodent continuous performance test are not caused by physical disengagement from the task

Modulation of High Impulsivity and Attentional Performance in Rats by Selective Direct and Indirect Dopaminergic and Noradrenergic Receptor Agonists

Differential effects of modafinil and methylphenidate on stop-signal reaction time task performance in the rat, and interactions with the dopamine receptor antagonist cis -flupenthixol

Cognitive Sequelae of Intravenous Amphetamine Self-Administration in Rats: Evidence for Selective Effects on Attentional Performance

Attention-modulating effects of cognitive enhancers

The Effects of D-Amphetamine, Alpha-Flupenthixol, and Mesolimbic Dopamine Depletion on a Test of Attentional Switching in the Rat

The 5-choice serial reaction time task: behavioural pharmacology and functional neurochemistry

Similar Effects of the Selective Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitor Atomoxetine on Three Distinct Forms of Impulsivity in the Rat.

Dissociable Effects of Noradrenaline, Dopamine, and Serotonin Uptake Blockade on Stop Task Performance in Rats

Assessing the stability of responding of male mice in the touchscreen 5 choice serial reaction time task: Focus on premature responding

Prefrontal and Monoaminergic Contributions to Stop-Signal Task Performance in Rats.

Differential Roles of Dopamine D1 and D2 Receptors in the Nucleus Accumbens in Attentional Performance on the Five-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task

An Objective Assessment of Effect of Stimulants on Attention in Individuals With ADHD

Waiting Impulsivity: the Influence of Acute Methylphenidate and Feedback

Noradrenergic Versus Dopaminergic Modulation of Impulsivity, Attention and Monitoring Behaviour in Rats Performing the Stop-Signal Task

Cognitive effects of psychotomimetic drugs in rats discriminating number cues

The Continuous Performance Test (rcpt) for Mice: a Novel Operant Touchscreen Test of Attentional Function.