Abstract:PURPOSE: We introduce two validated single (SH) and dual hormone (DH) mathematical models that represent an in-silico virtual patient population (VPP) for type 1 diabetes (T1D). The VPP can be used to evaluate automated insulin and glucagon delivery algorithms, so-called artificial pancreas (AP) algorithms that are currently being used to help people with T1D better manage their glucose levels. We present validation results comparing these virtual patients with true clinical patients undergoing AP control and demonstrate that the virtual patients behave similarly to people with T1D.METHODS: A single hormone virtual patient population (SH-VPP) was created that is comprised of eight differential equations that describe insulin kinetics, insulin dynamics and carbohydrate absorption. The parameters in this model that represent insulin sensitivity were statistically sampled from a normal distribution to create a population of virtual patients with different levels of insulin sensitivity. A dual hormone virtual patient population (DH-VPP) extended this SH-VPP by incorporating additional equations to represent glucagon kinetics and glucagon dynamics. The DH-VPP is comprised of thirteen differential equations and a parameter representing glucagon sensitivity, which was statistically sampled from a normal distribution to create virtual patients with different levels of glucagon sensitivity. We evaluated the SH-VPP and DH-VPP on a clinical data set of 20 people with T1D who participated in a 3.5-day outpatient AP study. Twenty virtual patients were matched with the 20 clinical patients by total daily insulin requirements and body weight. The identical meals given during the AP study were given to the virtual patients and the identical AP control algorithm that was used to control the glucose of the virtual patients was used on the clinical patients. We compared percent time in target range (70-180 mg/dL), time in hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL) and time in hyperglycemia (>180 mg/dL) for both the virtual patients and the actual patients.RESULTS: The subjects in the SH-VPP performed similarly vs. the actual patients (time in range: 78.1 ± 5.1% vs. 74.3 ± 8.1%, p = 0.11; time in hypoglycemia: 3.4 ± 1.3% vs. 2.8 ± 1.7%, p = 0.23). The subjects in the DH-VPP also performed similarly vs. the actual patients (time in range: 75.6 ± 5.5% vs. 71.9 ± 10.9%, p = 0.13; time in hypoglycemia: 0.9 ± 0.8% vs. 1.3 ± 1%, p = 0.19). While the VPPs tended to over-estimate the time in range relative to actual patients, the difference was not statistically significant.CONCLUSIONS: We have verified that a SH-VPP and a DH-VPP performed comparably with actual patients undergoing AP control using an identical control algorithm. The SH-VPP and DH-VPP may be used as a simulator for pre-evaluation of T1D control algorithms.

Interactive calculator to estimate insulin sensitivity in type 1 diabetes

A New Model to Estimate Insulin Resistance Via Clinical Parameters in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes

Establishment of Hyperinsulinemic Euglycemic Clamp Technique and the Reference Value of Insulin Sensitivity Index in Chinese

An online tool using clinical factors to estimate the probability of partial clinical remission of adult-onset Type 1 diabetes

Estimating insulin sensitivity and β-cell function from the oral glucose tolerance test: validation of a new insulin sensitivity and secretion (ISS) model

[Comparison of Methods to Detect Insulin Resistance in Obese Children and Adolescents].

The assessment of insulin resistance in man

Validation of Insulin Sensitivity Surrogate Indices and Prediction of Clinical Outcomes in Individuals with and Without Impaired Renal Function.

Calculated estimation of the metabolic clearance rate of insulin measured by glucose clamp examination in out-patient clinical practice

Comparison of Two Estimated Glucose Disposal Rate Methods for Detecting Insulin Resistance in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

The undervalued league of insulin resistance testing: uncovering their importance

A statistical virtual patient population for the glucoregulatory system in type 1 diabetes with integrated exercise model

Insulin sensitivity estimates and their longitudinal association with coronary artery disease in type 1 diabetes. Does it matter?

Evaluation of insulin sensitivity by hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp technique in Chinese patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus

Estimation of Glucose Absorption, Insulin Sensitivity, and Glucose Effectiveness From the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test

20/(fasting C-peptide × fasting plasma glucose) is a simple and effective index of insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a preliminary report

The 13C Glucose Breath Test Accurately Identifies Insulin Resistance in People With Type 1 Diabetes

A Mathematical Model-Derived Disposition Index Without Insulin Validated in Youth with Obesity

Insights into the Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Insulin Titration Application in Clinical Practice and Its Effects on Diabetes Outcomes

Biomarkers of insulin resistance and their performance as predictors of treatment response in adults with risk factors for type 2 diabetes

Beyond Stages: Predicting Individual Time Dependent Risk for Type 1 Diabetes