Abstract:This paper presents an approach to the Kirchhoff-Love plate theory (KLPT) using the finite difference method (FDM). The KLPT covers the case of small deflections, and shear deformations are not considered. The FDM is an approximate method for solving problems described with differential equations. The FDM does not involve solving differential equations; equations are formulated with values at selected points of the structure. Generally in the case of KLPT, the finite difference approximations are derived based on the fourth-order polynomial hypothesis (FOPH) and second-order polynomial hypothesis (SOPH) for the deflection surface. The FOPH is made for the fourth and third derivative of the deflection surface while the SOPH is made for its second and first derivative; this leads to a 13-point stencil for the governing equation. In addition, the boundary conditions and not the governing equations are applied at the plate edges. In this paper, the FOPH was made for all of the derivatives of the deflection surface; this led to a 25-point stencil for the governing equation. Furthermore, additional nodes were introduced at plate edges and at positions of discontinuity (continuous supports/hinges, incorporated beams, stiffeners, brutal change of stiffness, etc.), the number of additional nodes corresponding to the number of boundary conditions at the node of interest. The introduction of additional nodes allowed us to apply the governing equations at the plate edges and to satisfy the boundary and continuity conditions. First-order analysis, second-order analysis, buckling analysis, and vibration analysis of plates were conducted with this model. Moreover, plates of varying thickness and plates with stiffeners were analyzed. Finally, a direct time integration method (DTIM) was presented. The FDM-based DTIM enabled the analysis of forced vibration of structures, with damping taken into account. In first-order, second-order, buckling, and vibration analyses of rectangular plates, the results obtained in this paper were in good agreement with those of well-established methods, and the accuracy was increased through a grid refinement.

Euler-Bernoulli Beam Theory: First-Order Analysis, Second-Order Analysis, Stability, and Vibration Analysis Using the Finite Difference Method

A Numerically Stable Dynamic Coefficient Method and Its Application in Free Vibration of Partial-Interaction Continuous Composite Beams

BUCKLING ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES BY THE FINITE PARTICLE METHOD

Large Deflection Analysis of 3D Steel Frame Using Finite Particle Method

Elastoplastic Analysis with Fine Beam Model of Vector Form Intrinsic Finite Element

Lateral Buckling of Web-Tapered I-beams: A New Theory

Vector form intrinsic finite element analysis based on fine beam model

Triply Coupled Bending-Bending-Torsion Vibrational Analysis of Rotating Beams Using Fem and Dynamic Finite Element Formulation

Kirchhoff-Love Plate Theory: First-Order Analysis, Second-Order Analysis, Plate Buckling Analysis, and Vibration Analysis Using the Finite Difference Method

Three-Dimensional Beam Theory for Flexible Multibody Dynamics

Analysis of Tapered Timoshenko and Euler–Bernoulli Beams on an Elastic Foundation with Moving Loads

Nonlinear dynamic analysis of Timoshenko beams by BEM. Part II: applications and validation

Static, dynamic and stability analysis of structures composed of tapered beams

Basic displacement functions for centrifugally stiffened tapered beams

Free vibration and buckling analysis of functionally graded beams using the DMCDM

Exact Dynamic Stiffness Method for Non-Uniform Timoshenko Beam Vibrations and Bernoulli-Euler Column Buckling

Equivalently Analytical Solution for the Large Deformation of Slender Beams under Follower Loads: a Second-Order ANCF Approach

Solving a singular beam equation by the method of energy boundary functions

Comparison of finite element methods for dynamic analysis about rotating flexible beam

Static, stability and dynamic analyses of second strain gradient elastic Euler–Bernoulli beams

Numerical analysis of fractional‐order Euler–Bernoulli beam model under composite model