Endocrinology's early historians (1889-1914) and the forgotten prehistory of testosterone

Diederik F Janssen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qeae001
2024-02-03
Sexual Medicine Reviews
Abstract:Introduction An often-retold historical outline of endocrinology was established over a century ago. An exhaustive history of sexual physiology remains forthcoming, however. Objectives To explore and contextualize the remarkable medical-historical and medical-anthropologic frenzy triggered by Brown-Séquard's 1889 self-injections with testicular juice, which ultimately settled down into an early history of endocrinology. Methods Pertinent primary sources were selected from a broader study, primarily between 1889 and 1914, as well as selected older texts identified and unidentified by these sources. Results Endocrinology's early historians in a short space of time moved from the history of testicular opotherapy to that of glandular typology and physiology and to increasingly encompassing medical-historical accounts of internal secretion as an epochal idea. Early historians nominated "precursors" to Brown-Séquard but underestimated physiologic continuities—specifically, early modern protoendocrinologic notions concerning semen as a "recrement," notions still recited by Brown-Séquard and early Brown-Séquardists as well their detractors. Brown-Séquard himself worked through this old (recremental) concept of semen between 1889 and 1892 but was later identified with it, by among others Ancel and Bouin. Conclusion Western sexual physiology is a medical palimpsest, the undertexts of which remain to be studied in detail.
urology & nephrology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?