Abstract:Educational and Psychological Measurement, Ahead of Print. Rapid-guessing behavior in data can compromise our ability to estimate item and person parameters accurately. Consequently, it is crucial to model data with rapid-guessing patterns in a way that can produce unbiased ability estimates. This study proposes and evaluates three alternative modeling approaches that follow the logic of the effort-moderated item response theory model (EM-IRT) to analyze response data with rapid-guessing responses. One is the two-step EM-IRT model, which utilizes the item parameters estimated by respondents without rapid-guessing behavior and was initially proposed by Rios and Soland without further investigation. The other two models are effort-moderated multidimensional models (EM-MIRT), which we introduce in this study and vary as both between-item and within-item structures. The advantage of the EM-MIRT model is to account for the underlying relationship between rapid-guessing propensity and ability. The three models were compared with the traditional EM-IRT model regarding the accuracy of parameter recovery in various simulated conditions. Results demonstrated that the two-step EM-IRT and between-item EM-MIRT model consistently outperformed the traditional EM-IRT model under various conditions, with the two-step EM-IRT estimation generally delivering the best performance, especially for ability and item difficulty parameters estimation. In addition, different rapid-guessing patterns (i.e., difficulty-based, changing state, and decreasing effort) did not affect the performance of the two-step EM-IRT model. Overall, the findings suggest that the EM-IRT model with the two-step parameter estimation method can be applied in practice for estimating ability in the presence of rapid-guessing responses due to its accuracy and efficiency. The between-item EM-MIRT model can be used as an alternative model when there is no significant mean difference in the ability estimates between examinees who exhibit rapid-guessing behavior and those who do not.

Extended Asymptotic Identifiability of Nonparametric Item Response Models

New Paradigm of Identifiable General-response Cognitive Diagnostic Models: Beyond Categorical Data

Sufficient and Necessary Conditions for the Identifiability of DINA Models with Polytomous Responses

Nonlinear Sequential Designs for Logistic Item Response Theory Models with Applications to Computerized Adaptive Tests

Characteristic Function-Based Testing for Multifactor Continuous-Time Markov Models Via Nonparametric Regression

Joint Maximum Likelihood Estimation for High-dimensional Exploratory Item Response Analysis

Modeling Item-Level Heterogeneous Treatment Effects With the Explanatory Item Response Model: Leveraging Large-Scale Online Assessments to Pinpoint the Impact of Educational Interventions

Iterative Item Selection of Neighborhood Clusters: A Nonparametric and Non-IRT Method for Generating Miniature Computer Adaptive Questionnaires

Evaluating Statistical Hypotheses Using Weakly-Identifiable Estimating Functions.

On the Identifiability of Diagnostic Classification Models.

Asymptotically Correct Person Fit z-Statistics For the Rasch Testlet Model

Joint Maximum Likelihood Estimation for High-Dimensional Exploratory Item Factor Analysis

A nonparametric Bayesian item response modelling approach for clustering items and individuals simultaneously

Bayesian analysis of dynamic item response models in educational testing

Enhancing Effort-Moderated Item Response Theory Models by Evaluating a Two-Step Estimation Method and Multidimensional Variations on the Model

Item Response Thresholds Models

On the Identifiability of 3- and 4-Parameter Item Response Theory Models From the Perspective of Knowledge Space Theory

Robustness of Parameter Estimation to Assumptions of Normality in the Multidimensional Graded Response Model

Weak Identification in Discrete Choice Models

Redefining Item Response Models for Small Samples

Detecting uniform differential item functioning for continuous response computerized adaptive testing