Abstract:Background: Emergency departments (EDs) are complex and fast-paced clinical settings where a diagnosis is made in a time-, information-, and resource-constrained context. Thus, it is predisposed to suboptimal diagnostic outcomes, leading to errors and subsequent patient harm. Arriving at a timely and accurate diagnosis is an activity that occurs after an effective collaboration between the patient or caregiver and the clinical team within the ED. Interventions such as novel sociotechnical solutions are needed to mitigate errors and risks. Objective: This study aims to identify challenges that frontline ED health care providers and patients face in the ED diagnostic process and involve them in co-designing technological interventions to enhance diagnostic excellence. Methods: We will conduct separate sessions with ED health care providers and patients, respectively, to assess various design ideas and use a participatory design (PD) approach for technological interventions to improve ED diagnostic safety. In the sessions, various intervention ideas will be presented to participants through storyboards. Based on a preliminary interview study with ED patients and health care providers, we created intervention storyboards that illustrate different care contexts in which ED health care providers or patients experience challenges and show how each intervention would address the specific challenge. By facilitating participant group discussion, we will reveal the overlap between the needs of the design research team observed during fieldwork and the needs perceived by target users (ie, participants) in their own experience to gain their perspectives and assessment on each idea. After the group discussions, participants will rank the ideas and co-design to improve our interventions. Data sources will include audio and video recordings, design sketches, and ratings of intervention design ideas from PD sessions. The University of Michigan Institutional Review Board approved this study. This foundational work will help identify the needs and challenges of key stakeholders in the ED diagnostic process and develop initial design ideas, specifically focusing on sociotechnological ideas for patient-, health care provider-, and system-level interventions for improving patient safety in EDs. Results: The recruitment of participants for ED health care providers and patients is complete. We are currently preparing for PD sessions. The first results from design sessions with health care providers will be reported in fall 2024. Conclusions: The study findings will provide unique insights for designing sociotechnological interventions to support ED diagnostic processes. By inviting frontline health care providers and patients into the design process, we anticipate obtaining unique insights into the ED diagnostic process and designing novel sociotechnical interventions to enhance patient safety. Based on this study's collected data and intervention ideas, we will develop prototypes of multilevel interventions that can be tested and subsequently implemented for patients, health care providers, or hospitals as a system. International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/55357.

Development and Psychometric Analysis of a Patient-Reported Measure of Diagnostic Excellence for Emergency and Urgent Care Settings

Patient and care partner assessments of diagnostic excellence in the emergency department: A cognitive interview study

Achieving Diagnostic Excellence: Roadmaps to Develop and Use Patient-Reported Measures With an Equity Lens

Development and Implementation of a Digital Quality Measure of Emergency Cancer Diagnosis

Patient-reported outcome and experience domains for diagnostic excellence: a scoping review to inform future measure development

Assessing The Practice Of Data Quality Evaluation In A National Clinical Data Research Network Through A Systematic Scoping Review In The Era Of Real-World Data

Psychometric Assessment of an Item Bank for Adaptive Testing on Patient-Reported Experience of Care Environment for Severe Mental Illness: Validation Study

Charting Diagnostic Safety: Exploring Patient-Provider Discordance in Medical Record Documentation

Addressing diagnostic uncertainty and excellence in emergency care--from multicountry policy analysis to communication practice in Australian emergency departments: a multimethod study protocol

Identifying Interventions to Improve Diagnostic Safety in Emergency Departments: Protocol for a Participatory Design Study

Online public response to emergency department diagnostic error report: A qualitative study

Using Patient Experience Surveys to Identify Potential Diagnostic Safety Breakdowns: A Mixed Methods Study

Improving Patient Experience Scores in a Pediatric Emergency Department

Patient–Clinician Diagnostic Concordance upon Hospital Admission

The Aarhus statement on cancer diagnostic research: turning recommendations into new survey instruments

Development and Usability of an Endoscopist Report Card Assessing ERCP Quality

Assessing patient experience with patient safety in primary care: development and validation of the ASK-ME-questionnaire

Psychometric Testing of a Patient Empowerment, Engagement, and Activation Survey

Patient-Reported Experience Measures to Evaluate and Improve the Quality of Care in Nephrology

Patient‐Reported Experience Measures in Adult Inpatient Settings: A Systematic Review

Methods for and Challenges in Seeking Diagnostic Excellence