Abstract:Federated learning (FL) provides autonomy and privacy by design to participating peers, who cooperatively build a machine learning (ML) model while keeping their private data in their devices. However, that same autonomy opens the door for malicious peers to poison the model by conducting either untargeted or targeted poisoning attacks. The label-flipping (LF) attack is a targeted poisoning attack where the attackers poison their training data by flipping the labels of some examples from one class (i.e., the source class) to another (i.e., the target class). Unfortunately, this attack is easy to perform and hard to detect, and it negatively impacts the performance of the global model. Existing defenses against LF are limited by assumptions on the distribution of the peers' data and/or do not perform well with high-dimensional models. In this paper, we deeply investigate the LF attack behavior. We find that the contradicting objectives of attackers and honest peers on the source class examples are reflected on the parameter gradients corresponding to the neurons of the source and target classes in the output layer. This makes those gradients good discriminative features for the attack detection. Accordingly, we propose LFighter, a novel defense against the LF attack that first dynamically extracts those gradients from the peers' local updates and then clusters the extracted gradients, analyzes the resulting clusters, and filters out potential bad updates before model aggregation. Extensive empirical analysis on three data sets shows the effectiveness of the proposed defense regardless of the data distribution or model dimensionality. Also, LFighter outperforms several state-of-the-art defenses by offering lower test error, higher overall accuracy, higher source class accuracy, lower attack success rate, and higher stability of the source class accuracy. Our code and data are available for reproducibility purposes at https://github.com/NajeebJebreel/LFighter.

LFGurad: A defense against label flipping attack in federated learning for vehicular network

Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning Against Label-Flipping Attacks on Non-IID Data

Federated Split Learning with Data and Label Privacy Preservation in Vehicular Networks

LFighter: Defending against the label-flipping attack in federated learning

Federated Learning with Heterogeneous Data Handling for Robust Vehicular Object Detection

Secure Hierarchical Federated Learning in Vehicular Networks Using Dynamic Client Selection and Anomaly Detection

A Distributed Aggregation Approach for Vehicular Federated Learning

Secure and Efficient Decentralized Federated Learning with Data Representation Protection

Poisoning Attacks on Federated Learning for Autonomous Driving

Defending against label-flipping attacks in federated learning systems using uniform manifold approximation and projection

Federated Learning for Misbehaviour Detection with Variational Autoencoders and Gaussian Mixture Models

Federated learning system on autonomous vehicles for lane segmentation

G$^2$uardFL: Safeguarding Federated Learning Against Backdoor Attacks through Attributed Client Graph Clustering

VFL-Chain: Bulletproofing Federated Learning in the V2X Environments

Privacy-Preserved Federated Learning for Autonomous Driving

CrowdGuard: Federated Backdoor Detection in Federated Learning

Blockchain-Enabled Federated Learning Approach for Vehicular Networks

BadVFL: Backdoor Attacks in Vertical Federated Learning

Data Poisoning Attacks Against Federated Learning Systems

Mobility, Communication and Computation Aware Federated Learning for Internet of Vehicles

Label Inference Attacks Against Vertical Federated Learning