AGING POPULATION AND HEALTH INEQUALITIES IN THE RURAL AREAS OF CHINA
Zhaokang Yuan,Xiaoxing Z. He
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02892.x
2010-01-01
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Abstract:To the Editor: The global trends of population aging and increased demand for primary care have influenced China—the most populous country.1,2 Nevertheless, the rapid aging process in China reflects not only “demographic transition” of declining fertility and rising life expectancy, but also governmental policies and courses of actions. For example, the “one child” policy appears to be a direct catalyst of the abrupt and drastic decline in fertility.2 In addition, 1980s market-oriented reforms have led to the collapse of the 1960s and 1970s cooperative medical system (CMS), which performed well in providing affordable primary care, and have caused inequalities in that only civil servants and urban workers are entitled to social welfare and government- or employer-sponsored health care, whereas the majority of people in rural areas are not covered.3 Given that more than 57% of China's population is in rural areas,4 understanding the health and disease prevalence of the rural aging population is critical for social justice and health promotion programs to improve their health and quality of life.5,6 However, the health and disease prevalence of the rural aging population are unclear. A series of surveys were conducted in 2003 to 2008 to study health inequalities in rural areas of Jiangxi, where a new type of rural CMS—a government-sponsored program of healthcare reform—was implemented. Multiphase stratified random sampling methods were adopted to select the study sample, which covered three counties, nine townships, and 27 administrative villages, with 1,860 households per year. The study questionnaire was adopted from that of a national survey designed by the Ministry of Health. Trained interviewers (graduate students from the School of Public Health, Nanchang University) conducted in-home interviews. Baseline data on age, sex, income, and chronic diseases were collected during 2003/04. The follow-up surveys were conducted consecutively in 2006, 2007, and 2008. In order of low to high income, respondents were classified into seven groups: I (10%), II (10%), III (20%), IV (20%), V (20%), VI (10%), and VII (10%). The prevalence rate of chronic disease was defined as all new and old cases of chronic diseases within the half-year period. The “health inequalities” or the magnitude of socioeconomic inequalities in health were measured using the concentration index and slope index of inequity (SII), developed by the efforts of the World Health Organization.7,8 The SII measures the regression-based index of absolute effect, similar to that of population-attributable risk, that epidemiologists use. A total of 31,239 respondents participated in the surveys. The ratio of men to women was approximately 1.06. The mean age was 34. Respondents who were aged 50 and older represented 22% of the study sample at baseline. This group increased to 26% of the study sample by 2008. Approximately 8% of the study population was aged 65 and older. Overall, the prevalence rate of chronic diseases ranged from 8% to 14% at baseline and from 5% to 14% in the follow-up surveys. In general, respondents with the lowest income had a significantly higher prevalence rate of chronic diseases than those of the other groups. In the group aged 65 and older, the prevalence rate of chronic diseases was 21% to 27% at baseline and 10% to 40% in the follow-up surveys. The absolute values of the concentration index were relatively stable, whereas those of SII were more than three times as high in 2008 (Table 1). The higher absolute values of SII indicate the greater health inequalities between the top and bottom income groups in terms of prevalence rate differences in chronic diseases. The findings confirm that lower income or socioeconomic status is associated with higher prevalence rate of chronic diseases and health inequalities, as reported in other studies.3,7,9 The overall prevalence rate of chronic diseases is lower than China's 2008 national average estimates (20%) reported by the Ministry of Health in China,10 although the prevalence rate of chronic diseases in people aged 65 and older with lower income is significantly higher than the national average. It appears that the new type of rural CMS, launched in 2003, reduces health inequalities for rural populations but not for older populations. The policy implication is clear; recent government policy to revitalize the original CMS is the right thing to do to reduce urban and rural socioeconomic differences and health inequalities. Additional efforts are required for health promotion and disease prevention programs in people aged 65 and older with low income. The government needs to make sure that sufficient funds are allocated and reserved to sustain the new type of CMS to cover primary care for aging populations in all rural areas and to improve health equity. This study was supported by Natural Science Research Fund in China (70763007) and College of Urban Affairs' Junior Faculty Mini-Grant, Cleveland State University (0220177010WHITT05). Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that we have no financial or personal conflict of interest. Author Contribution: Zhaokang Yang: study design; data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation; and writing the letter. Xiaoxing He: conceptualization of the study, data interpretation, and writing the letter. Sponsor's Role: None.