Cardiovascular toxicity with CTLA‐4 inhibitors in cancer patients: A meta‐analysis

Huiyi Liu,Lu Fu,Shuyu Jin,Xingdong Ye,Yanlin Chen,Sijia Pu,Yumei Xue
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cai2.116
2024-04-18
Cancer Innovation
Abstract:1. CTLA‐4 inhibitors restore the T cell immune response against tumor cells. Tumors and cardiomyocytes, shared some muscle‐specific antigens, which trigger a cross‐reactivity with T cells. The inhibitors make cardiac cells susceptible to injury. 2. CTLA‐4 inhibitors significantly increased the incidence of all‐grade cardiovascular toxicity and severe cardiovascular toxicity in the patients. The risk of serious cardiovascular toxic events was independent of the type of adverse event. Background With the emergence of cytotoxic T lymphocyte‐associated protein‐4 (CTLA‐4) inhibitors, the outcomes of patients with malignant tumors have improved significantly. However, the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events has also increased, which can affect tumor treatment. In this study, we evaluated the incidence and severity of adverse cardiovascular events caused by CTLA‐4 inhibitors by analyzing reported trials that involved CTLA‐4 inhibitor therapy. Methods Randomized clinical trials published in English from January 1, 2013, to November 30, 2022, were searched using the Cochrane Library and PubMed databases. All included trials examined all grade and grades 3–5 cardiac and vascular adverse events. These involved comparisons of CTLA‐4 inhibitors to placebo, CTLA‐4 inhibitors plus chemotherapy to chemotherapy alone, CTLA‐4 inhibitors combined with PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors to PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors alone, and CTLA‐4 inhibitors plus target agent to PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors plus target agent. The odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the Mantel‐Haenszel method. Results Overall, 20 trials were included. CTLA‐4 inhibitors significantly increased the incidence of all‐grade cardiovascular toxicity (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.00–1.75, p = 0.05). The incidence of all‐grade cardiovascular toxicity increased in malignant tumor patients who received single‐agent CTLA‐4 inhibitors (OR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.13–2.65, p = 0.01), as well as the incidence rate of grades 3–5 cardiovascular adverse events (OR = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.08–3.70, p = 0.03). Compared with the non‐CTLA‐4 inhibitor group, CTLA‐4 inhibitors plus chemotherapy, PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors, or target agent did not significantly affect the incidence of cardiac and vascular toxicity. The incidence of grades 3–5 cardiac failure, hypertension, pericardial effusion, myocarditis, and atrial fibrillation were much higher among patients exposed to CTLA‐4 inhibitor, but the data were not statistically significant. Conclusion Our findings suggest that the incidence rate of all cardiovascular toxicity and severe cardiovascular toxicity increased in patients who were administered CTLA‐4 inhibitors. In addition, the risk of serious cardiovascular toxic events was independent of the type of adverse event. From these results, physicians should assess the benefits and risks of CTLA‐4 inhibitors when treating malignancies.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?