Abstract:Background: At a time when welfare contracts are in crisis, it is timely to discuss different forms of disruptive innovation and responses of medical finance and economic systems, especially adjusting with new instruments for recovery and innovative solutions for health reforms. Objective: The objective of this paper is to propose some ways to develop a framework for policy changes affecting life science sectors and healthcare. It aims to analyze the types of relationships between health or medical systems and the economic systems. Method: Medical systems used to be generally closed systems, but the new forms of delivery, especially with increase of telehealth and Mobile health (Mhealth) solutions (boosted by the COVID-19 pandemic, such as online consultations), have open traditional boundaries and generate more interactions with economic systems. It also led to new institutional arrangements at federal, national, or local levels, with different power games according to the history of institutions and cultural differences between countries. Results: Which system dynamics prevail will also depend on the political systems in place, for instance very innovative open innovation systems dominated by private players such as the USA empower individuals and favor intuitive and entrepreneurial states. On the other hand, systems historically dominated by socialized insurance or former communist countries, have investigated "attunements" or adaptation mechanisms in system intelligence. However, systemic changes are not only implemented by traditional rulers (government agencies, federal reserve banks) but also face the emergence of systemic platforms dominated by Big Tech players. The new agendas expressed for instance in the United Nation (UN) framework and the set of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) for climate change and sustainable growth, also require global adjustment of supply and demand, in a context where the traditional drug/vaccine split is challenged by the new technologies (e.g., mRNA technologies). Investment for drug research led to the development of COVID-19 vaccines, but also potential cancer vaccines. Finally, welfare economics is increasingly criticized among economist circles; it requires new design for global value assessment framework, facing growing inequalities and inter-generational challenges in aging populations. Conclusion: This paper contributes to new models of developments and different frameworks for multiple stakeholders with major technological changes.

Freeman’s broadening contribution revisited: reasoned-history and systemic STI policies from South America to the Global South

Review of the reverse innovation series in globalization and health – where are we and what else is needed?

International Business, Innovation and Ambidexterity: A Micro-Foundational Perspective

The Knowledge-Based Economy and the Global South

From the Great Divergence to South–South Divergence: New comparative horizons in global economic history

The process of paradigm change: the rise of guided innovation in China

Connecting the Empire: New Research Perspectives on Infrastructures and the Environment in the (Post)Colonial World

Engaging globally with how to achieve healthy societies: insights from India, Latin America and East and Southern Africa

North–South trade, technology diffusion, and uneven development

Academic Freedom and Innovation: A Research Note

The Institutional Building of Science and Innovation Diplomacy in Latin America: Toward a Comprehensive Analytical Typology

Seeds, Dams, and Khipus: Latin America's Eclectic Recent History of Technology

Sociological perspectives on innovation: key research issues and interdisciplinary prospects

The impact of knowledge diffusion on economic growth across countries

Innovation, institutions and development: a critical review and grounded heterodox economic analysis of late-industrialising contexts

Interdisciplinariedad y redes sociales en el siglo XXI: Debatiendo con Peter Burke el presente, pasado y futuro de la Ciencia Histórica

[From relativism to evaluation. Recent trends in the historiography of science and the humanities]

Policies for life sciences and healthcare in the global health framework

Something new from the South: community, work, and family in South Africa

Thinking with and Against the Social Determinants of Health: The Latin American Social Medicine (Collective Health) Critique from Jaime Breilh

Responsible north-south research and innovation: A framework for transdisciplinary research leadership and management