Abstract:Purpose This study aims to investigate the relationship between the attributes of corporate boards in UK companies and their tendency to assure their corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports. Design/methodology/approach From the agency theory perspective, the authors examine the impact of board attributes on the assurance of CSR reports for the Financial Times Stock Exchange (FTSE) 350 during 2016–2019. The authors used annual integrated reports, companies’ websites and Thomson Reuters Eikon database for data collection and the logistic regression for data analysis. Findings The results confirm that some board attributes significantly influence a company’s decision to assure its CSR reports. While board size, board tenure, the presence of female board members and female executive directors and Chief Executive Officers (CEOs)’ global working experience positively contribute to CSR assurance (CSRA) decisions, the chairman’s independence negatively contributes to it. However, board independence, board meetings and board financial expertise demonstrate no effect on the CSRA decision. Research limitations/implications The authors focus on some attributes of board members, but the authors did not consider board diversity in its broader meaning. Moreover, the effect of board committees and their attributes on CSRA was not addressed. The authors also did not consider the impact of scope, the quality level of assurance service and the differences between assurance providers on companies’ decisions to neither undertake CSRA nor choose between assurance providers. Practical implications The study provides insights into the increasing demand on voluntary assurance to boost the credibility of CSR reports and the role of the board of directors (BOD) in taking this initiative. The findings highlight the importance of board diversity (e.g. gender) in improving transparency and sustainability reporting, which can help policymakers and regulators in shaping future governance policies. Additionally, the findings refer to a drawback in the UK Corporate Governance Code regarding the chairman’s independence, which requires corrective actions from the Financial Reporting Council. The findings raise concern over the small share of audit firms in the assurance service market, despite the growing demand for these services in the UK, which may require more attention to these services from the audit firms. Social implications Companies are increasingly pressurized, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic, to discharge their accountability to stakeholders and to act in a socially responsible manner in their business activities. CSR reporting is one of the main tools that companies use to communicate their social activities. Understanding the determinants of voluntary CSRA helps to increase the credibility of CSR reports and the favorable response to social pressure. Originality/value The authors add empirical evidence to the limited literature on CSRA about the role of the BOD in undertaking companies’ social responsibility, improving CSR reporting and reducing information asymmetry. It also highlights the significance of maintaining a balanced BOD in terms of gender, experience and tenure, in minimizing the risk of perpetuating non-transparent integrated reporting.

Do board monitoring and audit committee quality help risky firms reduce CSR controversies?

Board Gender Diversity,Managerial Power and Demand for External Audit

CSR reporting, assurance, and firm value and risk: The moderating effects of CSR committees and executive compensation

Audit and CSR committees: are they complements or substitutes in CSR reporting, assurance and GRI framework adoption?

Does CSR Reduce Firm Risk? Evidence from Controversial Industry Sectors

Earnings management and sustainability assurance: The moderating role of CSR committee

Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect the Timeliness of Audited Financial Information? Evidence from “100 Best Corporate Citizens”

Can Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility Reduce Firms’ Idiosyncratic Risk? Evidence From China

CSR transparency and firm value: Is the connection differential for cost leaders and differentiators?

Does Corporate Social Responsibility Impact on Corporate Risk-Taking? Evidence from Emerging Economy

Is Corporate Social Responsibility Performance Related to Conditional Accounting Conservatism?

Controversial Industries , Regional Differences , and Risk : Role of CSR

Does board diversity influence firms’ corporate social responsibility reputation?

The moderating role of CSR in board gender diversity and firm financial performance: empirical evidence from an emerging economy

How Do Independent Directors View Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) During a Stressful Time? Evidence From the Financial Crisis

Corporate Social Responsibility, Audit Committee Expertise, and Financial Reporting: Empirical Evidence from Korea

CSR and Earnings Management in India: Does Auditor’s Opinion on Internal Control Matters?

Corporate Social Responsibility in the Age of Activist Directorships

Attributes of corporate boards and assurance of corporate social responsibility reporting: evidence from the UK

Does corporate social responsibility mediate the relationship between board diversity and financial distress: evidence from an emerging economy?

Doing Well While Doing Bad? CSR in Controversial Industry Sectors