Abstract:RationaleAcute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is frequently associated with hemodynamic instability which appears as the main factor associated with mortality. Shock is driven by pulmonary hypertension, deleterious effects of mechanical ventilation (MV) on right ventricular (RV) function, and associated-sepsis. Hemodynamic effects of ventilation are due to changes in pleural pressure (Ppl) and changes in transpulmonary pressure (TP). TP affects RV afterload, whereas changes in Ppl affect venous return. Tidal forces and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) increase pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) in direct proportion to their effects on mean airway pressure (mPaw). The acutely injured lung has a reduced capacity to accommodate flowing blood and increases of blood flow accentuate fluid filtration. The dynamics of vascular pressure may contribute to ventilator-induced injury (VILI). In order to optimize perfusion, improve gas exchange, and minimize VILI risk, monitoring hemodynamics is important.Results During passive ventilation pulse pressure variations are a predictor of fluid responsiveness when conditions to ensure its validity are observed, but may also reflect afterload effects of MV. Central venous pressure can be helpful to monitor the response of RV function to treatment. Echocardiography is suitable to visualize the RV and to detect acute cor pulmonale (ACP), which occurs in 20–25 % of cases. Inserting a pulmonary artery catheter may be useful to measure/calculate pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary and systemic vascular resistance, and cardiac output. These last two indexes may be misleading, however, in cases of West zones 2 or 1 and tricuspid regurgitation associated with RV dilatation. Transpulmonary thermodilution may be useful to evaluate extravascular lung water and the pulmonary vascular permeability index. To ensure adequate intravascular volume is the first goal of hemodynamic support in patients with shock. The benefit and risk balance of fluid expansion has to be carefully evaluated since it may improve systemic perfusion but also may decrease ventilator-free days, increase pulmonary edema, and promote RV failure. ACP can be prevented or treated by applying RV protective MV (low driving pressure, limited hypercapnia, PEEP adapted to lung recruitability) and by prone positioning. In cases of shock that do not respond to intravascular fluid administration, norepinephrine infusion and vasodilators inhalation may improve RV function. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has the potential to be the cause of, as well as a remedy for, hemodynamic problems. Continuous thermodilution-based and pulse contour analysis-based cardiac output monitoring are not recommended in patients treated with ECMO, since the results are frequently inaccurate. Extracorporeal CO2 removal, which could have the capability to reduce hypercapnia/acidosis-induced ACP, cannot currently be recommended because of the lack of sufficient data.

Fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: a post hoc analysis of the HEMOPRED study

Clinical Study of Passive Leg Raising As an Indicator of Fluid Responsiveness in Severe Septic Patients

Declining Mortality in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: an Analysis of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network Trials

RESPIRATION-RELATED VARIATIONS IN CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE AS PREDICTORS OF FLUID RESPONSIVENESS IN SPONTANEOUSLY BREATHING PATIENTS

Predictors of fluid responsiveness in the operating room: a narrative review

Preload Responsiveness in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Managed With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Preload responsiveness–guided fluid removal in mechanically ventilated patients with fluid overload: A comprehensive clinical–physiological study

Fluid responsiveness predicted by elevation of PEEP in patients with septic shock

Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Critically Ill Children: So Many Tools and So Few Answers*

Changes in central venous-to-arterial PCO2 difference and central venous oxygen saturation as markers to define fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: a pot-hoc analysis of a multi-center prospective study

The predictability of dynamic preload indices depends on the volume of fluid challenge: A prospective observational study in the operating theater

Machine learning methods to improve bedside fluid responsiveness prediction in severe sepsis or septic shock: an observational study

Assessment of fluid responsiveness in children using respiratory variations in descending aortic flow

Prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with hemodynamic stability: a prospective repeated-measures study

Experts’ opinion on management of hemodynamics in ARDS patients: focus on the effects of mechanical ventilation

Cumulative fluid balance predicts mortality and increases time on mechanical ventilation in ARDS patients: An observational cohort study

Respiratory drive heterogeneity associated with systemic inflammation and vascular permeability in acute respiratory distress syndrome

Passive leg raising test induced changes in plethysmographic variability index to assess fluid responsiveness in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients with acute circulatory failure

Do ScvO2 variations induced by passive leg raising predict fluid responsiveness? A prospective study

Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Fluid Management in the PICU

Assessing Fluid Resuscitation in Adults with Sepsis Who Are Not Mechanically Ventilated: a Systematic Review of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies